Nature and nurture in cognition

被引:17
作者
Khalidi, MA [1 ]
机构
[1] Amer Univ Beirut, Dept Philosophy, Beirut, Lebanon
关键词
D O I
10.1093/bjps/53.2.251
中图分类号
N09 [自然科学史]; B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ; 010108 ; 060207 ; 060305 ; 0712 ;
摘要
This paper advocates a dispositional account of innate cognitive capacities, which has an illustrious history from Plato to Chomsky. The 'triggering model' of innateness, first made explicit by Stich ([1975]), explicates the notion in terms of the relative informational content of the stimulus (input) and the competence (output). The advantage of this model of innateness is that it does not make a problematic reference to normal conditions and avoids relativizing innate traits to specific populations, as biological models of innateness are forced to do. Relativization can be avoided in the case of cognitive capacities precisely because informational content is involved. Even though one cannot measure output relative to input in a precise way, there are indirect and approximate ways of assessing the degree of innateness of a specific cognitive capacity.
引用
收藏
页码:251 / 272
页数:22
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1999, WHATS WITHIN
[2]  
Ariew A, 1999, WHERE BIOLOGY MEETS PSYCHOLOGY, P117
[3]   HOW HERITABILITY MISLEADS ABOUT RACE [J].
BLOCK, N .
COGNITION, 1995, 56 (02) :99-128
[4]  
GIFFORD F, 1990, BIOL PHILOS, V5, P237
[5]   On the theoretical role of "genetic coding" [J].
Godfrey-Smith, P .
PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, 2000, 67 (01) :26-44
[6]   DEVELOPMENTAL EXPLANATION AND THE ONTOGENY OF BIRDSONG - NATURE NURTURE REDUX [J].
JOHNSTON, TD .
BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 1988, 11 (04) :617-629
[7]   Innateness and domain specificity [J].
Khalidi, MA .
PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES, 2001, 105 (02) :191-210
[8]  
LEWONTIN RC, 1974, AM J HUM GENET, V26, P400
[9]  
Quine W.V., 1935, WAYS PARADOX OTHER E, P70
[10]   APPORTIONING CAUSAL RESPONSIBILITY [J].
SOBER, E .
JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY, 1988, 85 (06) :303-318