A double-blind placebo-controlled comparison of tramadol/acetaminophen and tramadol in patients with postoperative dental pain

被引:56
作者
Fricke, JR
Hewitt, DJ
Jordan, DM
Fisher, A
Rosenthal, NR
机构
[1] Austin Oral Surg Associates, Austin, TX 78704 USA
[2] OrthoMcNeil Pharmaceut Inc, Raritan, NJ USA
关键词
tramadol/acetaminophen; tramadol; postsurgical pain; third molar extraction;
D O I
10.1016/j.pain.2004.01.004
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
The objective of this study was to compare the analgesic efficacy of tramadol/acetaminophen (APAP) (total dose 75 mg/650 mg) and tramadol (total dose 100 mg) for the control of pain after oral surgery. A total of 456 patients with moderate-to-severe pain within 5 It after extraction of two or more third molars were randomized to receive two identical encapsulated tablets containing tramadol/APAP 37.5 mg/325 mg, tramadol 50 mg, or placebo. Tramadol/APAP was superior to tramadol (P < 0.001) or placebo (P < 0.001) on all efficacy measures: total pain relief (PAR) over 6 h (7.4, 2.5, and 1.5, respectively, on a scale of 0-24); sum of pain intensity differences (PIDs) (3.1, 0.6, and 0.1, respectively, on a scale of -6 to 18); and sum of PAR and PID (10.5, 3.1, and 1.6, respectively, on a scale of -6 to 42). Median times to onset of perceptible and meaningful PAR were 37.6 and 126.5 min, respectively, for the tramadol/APAP group (P < 0.001 for each, compared with tramadol and placebo arms). The most common adverse events with active treatment were nausea, dizziness, and vomiting; these events occurred more frequently in the tramadol group than in the tramadol/APAP group. This study established the superiority of tramadol/APAP 75 mg/650 mg over tramadol 100 mg in the treatment of acute pain following oral surgery. (C) 2004 International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:250 / 257
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Confidence intervals for the number needed to treat
    Altman, DG
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1998, 317 (7168) : 1309 - 1312
  • [2] Baseline pain and response to analgesic medications in the postsurgery dental pain model
    Averbuch, M
    Katzper, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2000, 40 (02) : 133 - 137
  • [3] ASPIRIN AND ACETAMINOPHEN AS CONSTITUENTS OF ANALGESIC COMBINATIONS
    BEAVER, WT
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1981, 141 : 293 - 300
  • [4] BOURNE MH, 2003, J PAIN S1, V4, P88
  • [5] A postmarketing surveillance program to monitor Ultram® (tramadol hydrochloride) abuse in the United States
    Cicero, TJ
    Adams, EH
    Geller, A
    Inciardi, JA
    Muñoz, A
    Schnoll, SH
    Senay, EC
    Woody, GE
    [J]. DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 1999, 57 (01) : 7 - 22
  • [6] THE NUMBER NEEDED TO TREAT - A CLINICALLY USEFUL MEASURE OF TREATMENT EFFECT
    COOK, RJ
    SACKETT, DL
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1995, 310 (6977) : 452 - 454
  • [7] COOPER SA, 1976, CLIN PHARMACOL THER, V20, P241
  • [8] MODELS FOR CLINICAL-ASSESSMENT OF ORAL ANALGESICS
    COOPER, SA
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1983, 75 (5A) : 24 - 29
  • [9] DESJARDINS PJ, 1993, CLIN PHARMACOL THER, V53, P172
  • [10] Contribution of monoaminergic modulation to the analgesic effect of tramadol
    Desmeules, JA
    Piguet, V
    Collart, L
    Dayer, P
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1996, 41 (01) : 7 - 12