The Neurobiology of Reference-Dependent Value Computation

被引:104
作者
De Martino, Benedetto [1 ,2 ]
Kumaran, Dharshan [2 ]
Holt, Beatrice [2 ]
Dolan, Raymond J. [2 ]
机构
[1] CALTECH, Pasadena, CA 91125 USA
[2] UCL, Wellcome Trust Ctr Neuroimaging, London WC1N 3BG, England
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
ORBITOFRONTAL CORTEX; DECISION-MAKING; HUMAN BRAIN; NEURONAL-ACTIVITY; REWARD PREFERENCE; DORSAL STRIATUM; ECONOMIC VALUE; LOSS AVERSION; PREDICTION; RISK;
D O I
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4832-08.2009
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
A key focus of current research in neuroeconomics concerns how the human brain computes value. Although, value has generally been viewed as an absolute measure (e. g., expected value, reward magnitude), much evidence suggests that value is more often computed with respect to a changing reference point, rather than in isolation. Here, we present the results of a study aimed to dissociate brain regions involved in reference-independent (i.e., "absolute") value computations, from those involved in value computations relative to a reference point. During functional magnetic resonance imaging, subjects acted as buyers and sellers during a market exchange of lottery tickets. At a behavioral level, we demonstrate that subjects systematically accorded a higher value to objects they owned relative to those they did not, an effect that results from a shift in reference point (i.e., status quo bias or endowment effect). Our results show that activity in orbitofrontal cortex and dorsal striatum track parameters such as the expected value of lottery tickets indicating the computation of reference-independent value. In contrast, activity in ventral striatum indexed the degree to which stated prices, at a within-subjects and between-subjects level, were distorted with respect to a reference point. The findings speak to the neurobiological underpinnings of reference dependency during real market value computations.
引用
收藏
页码:3833 / 3842
页数:10
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
ADLER K, 1993, VISION CODING EFFICI
[2]   The role of the dorsal striatum in reward and decision-making [J].
Balleine, Bernard W. ;
Delgado, Mauricio R. ;
Hikosaka, Okihide .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2007, 27 (31) :8161-8165
[3]  
Barto A.G., 1998, REINFORCMENT LEARNIN
[4]   MEASURING UTILITY BY A SINGLE-RESPONSE SEQUENTIAL METHOD [J].
BECKER, GM ;
DEGROOT, MH ;
MARSCHAK, J .
BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE, 1964, 9 (03) :226-232
[5]   Neuroeconomics: How neuroscience can inform economics [J].
Camerer, C ;
Loewenstein, G ;
Prelec, D .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC LITERATURE, 2005, 43 (01) :9-64
[6]   Effects of expectations for different reward magnitudes on neuronal activity in primate striatum [J].
Cromwell, HC ;
Schultz, W .
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2003, 89 (05) :2823-2838
[7]  
Dayan P., 2001, Theoretical neuroscience: Computational and mathematical modeling of neural systems
[8]   Explaining Enhanced Logical Consistency during Decision Making in Autism [J].
De Martino, Benedetto ;
Harrison, Neil A. ;
Knafo, Steven ;
Bird, Geoff ;
Dolan, Raymond J. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2008, 28 (42) :10746-10750
[9]   Frames, biases, and rational decision-making in the human brain [J].
De Martino, Benedetto ;
Kumaran, Dharshan ;
Seymour, Ben ;
Dolan, Raymond J. .
SCIENCE, 2006, 313 (5787) :684-687
[10]   Dorsal striatum responses to reward and punishment: Effects of valence and magnitude manipulations [J].
Delgado, M. R. ;
Locke, H. M. ;
Stenger, V. A. ;
Fiez, J. A. .
COGNITIVE AFFECTIVE & BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2003, 3 (01) :27-38