Epidural test dose with levobupivacaine and ropivacaine:: determination of ED50 motor block after spinal administration

被引:31
作者
Camorcia, M
Capogna, G
Lyons, G
Columb, M
机构
[1] Citta Roma Hosp, Dept Anaesthesia, I-00152 Rome, Italy
[2] St James Univ Hosp, Dept Anaesthesia, Leeds LS9 7TF, W Yorkshire, England
[3] Univ S Manchester Hosp, Dept Anaesthesia & Intens Care, Wythenshawe, England
关键词
anaesthetics local; levobupivacaine; ropivacaine; analgesia; obstetric; analgesic techniques; epidural;
D O I
10.1093/bja/aeh155
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 [麻醉学];
摘要
Background. When a test is required to detect a possible intrathecal catheter, many would seek to use the same local anaesthetic as that used for epidural analgesia. The rapid onset of inappropriate motor block after a local anaesthetic administered epidurally implies intrathecal spread. Because of claims of greater sensory-motor separation, or because of reduced potency compared with bupivacaine, the efficacy of the new local anaesthetics in intrathecal testing has been questioned. The aim of this study was to establish the feasibility of a test dose for an inadvertent intrathecal catheter using ropivacaine and levobupivacaine, and to establish the dose required. Methods. Sixty women undergoing elective Caesarean section with a combined spinal- epidural technique were enrolled into this prospective, double-blind sequential allocation study. The women were randomized to receive plain levobupivacaine 0.5% or ropivacaine 0.5% intrathecally. The dose was determined according to up-down sequential allocation. The end-point was any evidence of lower limb motor block within 5 min of injection. Results. The ED50 motor block at 5 min was 4.8 mg (95% CI, 4.49, 5.28) for levobupivacaine and 5.9 mg (95% CI, 4.82, 6.98) for ropivacaine (95% CI difference, 0.052, 1.98) (P=0.04). The estimated ED95 motor block was 5.9 mg (95% CI 5.19, 6.71) for levobupivacaine and 8.3 mg (95% CI, 6.30, 10.44) for ropivacaine. The potency ratio between the two drugs was 0.83 (95% CI, 0.69, 0.99). Conclusions. Both local anaesthetics produce evidence of motor block within 5 min of intrathecal injection and could serve as tests of intrathecal administration. Derived ED95 values suggest 10 mg doses should be effective, but this study did not measure predictive value. Ropivacaine is less potent for motor block than levobupivacaine by a factor of 0.83 (P<0.04).
引用
收藏
页码:850 / 853
页数:4
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]
ARMITAGE P, 1994, STAT METHODS MED RES, P136
[2]
Relative potencies of bupivacaine and ropivacaine for analgesia in labour [J].
Capogna, G ;
Celleno, D ;
Fusco, P ;
Lyons, G ;
Columb, M .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1999, 82 (03) :371-373
[3]
AN ANALYSIS OF COMPLICATIONS OF EXTRADURAL AND CAUDAL BLOCK [J].
DAWKINS, CJM .
ANAESTHESIA, 1969, 24 (04) :554-+
[4]
Dixon WJ, 1983, INTRO STAT ANAL, P428
[5]
Accidental dural puncture rates in UK obstetric practice [J].
Gleeson, CM ;
Reynolds, F .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA, 1998, 7 (04) :242-246
[6]
Quantitative assessment of motor block in labouring women receiving epidural analgesia [J].
Graham, AC ;
McClure, JH .
ANAESTHESIA, 2001, 56 (05) :470-476
[7]
Hodgson PS, 1999, BRIT J ANAESTH, V82, P207
[8]
Kee WDN, 2001, ANESTH ANALG, V92, P1529
[9]
The relative motor blocking potencies of epidural bupivacaine and ropivacaine in labor [J].
Lacassie, HJ ;
Columb, MO ;
Lacassie, HP ;
Lantadilla, RA .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2002, 95 (01) :204-208
[10]
LACASSIE HJ, 2002, EUR J ANAESTH, V19, pA552