Interrater reliability of the Bruininks-Oseretsky test of motor proficiency-long form

被引:19
作者
Wilson, BN
Kaplan, BJ
Crawford, SG
Dewey, D
机构
[1] Alberta Childrens Prov Gen Hosp, Res Ctr, Behav Res Unit, Calgary, AB T2T 5C7, Canada
[2] Univ Calgary, Dept Pediat, Calgary, AB T2T 5C7, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1123/apaq.17.1.95
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
To examine the reliability of the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency-long Form (BOTMP-LF), approximately 40 therapists completed a questionnaire on the administration and scoring of this test (72% response rate). A large degree of inconsistency between therapists was found. This prompted a study of interrater reliability of six therapists who received rigorous training on the BOTMP-LF. Results indicated that consistency of scoring between testers was statistically high for the battery, composite, and subtest scores. However, item-by-item agreement was low for many items, and agreement between raters on their diagnosis of the children as having motor problems was only fair to good. There was no difference in interrater reliability of the test for children with and without learning, attentional, or motor coordination problems. Some limitations of the BOTMP-LF are apparent from these studies.
引用
收藏
页码:95 / 110
页数:16
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], AUSTR OCCUPATIONAL T
[2]  
[Anonymous], ADAPTED PHYS ACTIVIT
[3]  
Bruininks RH, 1978, BRUININKSOSERETSKY T
[4]  
Burton A., 1992, Adapt Phys Activ Q, V9, P14, DOI [DOI 10.1123/APAQ.9.1, 10.1123/apaq.9.1.14, DOI 10.1123/APAQ.9.1.14]
[5]  
Burton A. W., 1998, Human Kinetics
[6]  
CICCHETTI DV, 1976, YALE J BIOL MED, V49, P373
[7]   PEDIATRIC ASSESSMENTS - A SURVEY OF THEIR USE BY OCCUPATIONAL THERAPISTS IN NORTHWESTERN SCHOOL SYSTEMS [J].
CROWE, TK .
OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY JOURNAL OF RESEARCH, 1989, 9 (05) :273-286
[8]  
Fox AM, 1996, CAN FAM PHYSICIAN, V42, P1965
[9]  
GOWLAND C, 1991, REV SELECTED MEASURE
[10]   A REVIEW OF THE BRUININKS-OSERETSKY TEST OF MOTOR PROFICIENCY [J].
HATTIE, J ;
EDWARDS, H .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1987, 57 :104-113