Accreditation and the use of outcomes-oriented information systems

被引:8
作者
Wilkerson, DL
机构
[1] Res. Qual. Improvement Commn. A., Tucson, AZ
[2] CARF, Tucson, AZ 85712
来源
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION | 1997年 / 78卷 / 08期
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0003-9993(97)90153-2
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Rehabilitation programs of all types and sizes must be able to use information technology to respond to both internal and external forces. One can anticipate that consumer-driven care will mean a desire for and access to more public information about health plans, specialty components of health care (eg, rehabilitation), and the quality of plans and providers. Providers need information with which to plan and manage their outcomes and resource allocation, to monitor and improve the quality of services, and to communicate with external stakeholders. The Commission on Accreditation of Rehabilitation Facilities (CARF) has for more than two decades required accredited organizations to have active outcome-oriented program evaluation systems. Yet, accreditation requirements have historically been process-oriented. This process orientation is now evolving toward an outcome orientation, both in the accreditation environment at large, and at CARF. This article describes these outcome-oriented initiatives, including CARF SCoRs(SM), a standards conformance rating system under development at CARE, and a project to identify a limited, uniform set of performance indicators for rehabilitation programs. In addition, the article reflects on the significance of a potential National Information System for brain injury to the accreditation and outcomes arena. (C) 1997 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:S31 / S35
页数:5
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1980, International classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps
[2]   Putting it (performance measures) together: An interview with Jerod Loeb [J].
Berman, S ;
Loeb, J .
JOINT COMMISSION JOURNAL ON QUALITY IMPROVEMENT, 1996, 22 (07) :518-526
[3]  
Crosby P. B., 1979, Quality is Free-The Art of Making Quality Certain, V17, P174
[4]  
DEJONG G, 1995, OUTCOME ORIENTED REH, P3
[5]  
Deming E.W., 1982, Out of the crisis
[6]  
DONALDSON MS, 1994, HLTH DATA INFORMATIO
[7]   Uniform data system for medical rehabilitation - Report of first admissions for 1995 [J].
Fiedler, RC ;
Granger, CV .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 1997, 76 (01) :76-81
[8]  
GALVIN DE, 1997, WINT C COMM ACCR REH
[9]  
Hamilton B., 1987, Rehabilitation outcomes: analysis and measurement, V1st
[10]   Descriptive findings from the traumatic brain injury model systems national data base [J].
HarrisonFelix, C ;
Newton, CN ;
Hall, KM ;
Kreutzer, JS .
JOURNAL OF HEAD TRAUMA REHABILITATION, 1996, 11 (05) :1-14