Decomposing technical efficiency and scale elasticity in two-stage network DEA

被引:66
作者
Sahoo, Biresh K. [1 ]
Zhu, Joe [2 ]
Tone, Kaoru [3 ]
Klemen, Bernhard M. [4 ]
机构
[1] Xavier Inst Management, Bhubaneswar 751013, Orissa, India
[2] Worcester Polytech Inst, Sch Business, Worcester, MA 01609 USA
[3] Natl Grad Inst Policy Studies, Minato Ku, Tokyo 1068677, Japan
[4] Morgan Stanley, Investment Banking Div, London E14 4AD, England
基金
奥地利科学基金会; 日本学术振兴会;
关键词
Data envelopment analysis; Network DEA; Returns to scale; Scale elasticity decomposition; Technical efficiency decomposition; DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; DISTANCE FUNCTION; RETURNS; MODELS; ECONOMIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejor.2013.09.046
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
The constant returns to scale assumption maintained by neoclassical theorists for justifying the black-box structure of production technology in long run does not necessarily allow one to infer that there are no scale benefits available in its sub-technologies. Most of real-life production technologies are multi-stage in nature, and the sources of increasing returns lie in the sub-technologies. It is, therefore, imperative to estimate the scale economies of a firm not only for the network technology but also for the sub-technologies. To accomplish this, two approaches are suggested in this contribution, based on the premise concerning whether a network technology construct considers allocative inefficiency. The first approach, which is ours, makes use of a single network technology for two interdependent sub-technologies. The second approach, which is due to Kao and Hwang (2011), however, assumes complete allocative efficiency by considering two independent sub-technology frontiers, one for each sub-technology. The distinction between these two approaches is important from a policy point of view since the network efficiencies revealed from these two approaches have distinctive causative factors that do not permit them to be used interchangeably. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:584 / 594
页数:11
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
Aburzzi A., 1965, MANAGE SCI, V11, pB98
[2]  
BAKSHI MS, 1969, MANAGE SCI B-APPL, V16, pB247
[3]   Returns to scale in different DEA models [J].
Banker, RD ;
Cooper, WW ;
Seiford, LM ;
Thrall, RM ;
Zhu, J .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2004, 154 (02) :345-362
[4]   SOME MODELS FOR ESTIMATING TECHNICAL AND SCALE INEFFICIENCIES IN DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS [J].
BANKER, RD ;
CHARNES, A ;
COOPER, WW .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1984, 30 (09) :1078-1092
[5]   ESTIMATION OF RETURNS TO SCALE USING DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS [J].
BANKER, RD ;
THRALL, RM .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1992, 62 (01) :74-84
[6]  
Baumol W.J., 1988, Contestable Markets and the Theory of Industry Structure
[7]   Measuring Information Technology's Indirect Impact on Firm Performance [J].
Yao Chen ;
Joe Zhu .
Information Technology and Management, 2004, 5 (1-2) :9-22
[8]   Evaluation of information technology investment: a data envelopment analysis approach [J].
Chen, Y ;
Liang, L ;
Yang, F ;
Zhu, J .
COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2006, 33 (05) :1368-1379
[9]   Equivalence in two-stage DEA approaches [J].
Chen, Yao ;
Liang, Liang ;
Zhu, Joe .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2009, 193 (02) :600-604
[10]   Network DEA pitfalls: Divisional efficiency and frontier projection under general network structures [J].
Chen, Yao ;
Cook, Wade D. ;
Kao, Chiang ;
Zhu, Joe .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2013, 226 (03) :507-515