Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness: Assessment with Whole-Lesion Histogram Analysis of the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient

被引:284
作者
Donati, Olivio F. [1 ]
Mazaheri, Yousef [2 ]
Afaq, Asim [1 ]
Vargas, Hebert A. [1 ]
Zheng, Junting [3 ]
Moskowitz, Chaya S. [3 ]
Hricak, Hedvig [1 ]
Akin, Oguz [1 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Radiol, New York, NY 10065 USA
[2] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Med Phys, New York, NY 10065 USA
[3] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, New York, NY 10065 USA
关键词
GLEASON SCORE; NORMAL TISSUE; 3; T;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.13130973
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
100231 [临床病理学]; 100902 [航空航天医学];
摘要
To evaluate the relationship between prostate cancer aggressiveness and histogram-derived apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) parameters obtained from whole-lesion assessment of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the prostate and to determine which ADC metric may help best differentiate low-grade from intermediate-or high-grade prostate cancer lesions. The institutional review board approved this retrospective HIPAA-compliant study of 131 men (median age, 60 years) who underwent diffusion-weighted MR imaging before prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Clinically significant tumors (tumor volume > 0.5 mL) were identified at wholemount step-section histopathologic examination, and Gleason scores of the tumors were recorded. A volume of interest was drawn around each significant tumor on ADC maps. The mean, median, and 10th and 25th percentile ADCs were determined from the whole-lesion histogram and correlated with the Gleason score by using the Spearman correlation coefficient (rho). The ability of each parameter to help differentiate tumors with a Gleason score of 6 from those with a Gleason score of at least 7 was assessed by using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (A(z)). In total, 116 clinically significant lesions (89 in the peripheral zone, 27 in the transition zone) were identified in 85 of the 131 patients (65%). Forty-six patients did not have a clinically significant lesion. For mean ADC, median ADC, 10th percentile ADC, and 25th percentile ADC, the Spearman r values for correlation with Gleason score were -0.31, -0.30, -0.36, and -0.35, respectively, whereas the A(z) values for differentiating lesions with a Gleason score of 6 from those with a Gleason score of at least 7 were 0.704, 0.692, 0.758, and 0.723, respectively. The A(z) of 10th percentile ADC was significantly higher than that of the mean ADC for all lesions and peripheral zone lesions (P = .0001). When whole-lesion histograms were used to derive ADC parameters, 10th percentile ADC correlated with Gleason score better than did other ADC parameters, suggesting that 10th percentile ADC may prove to be optimal for differentiating low-grade from intermediate-or high-grade prostate cancer with diffusion-weighted MR imaging. (C) RSNA, 2013
引用
收藏
页码:143 / 152
页数:10
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]
Focal therapy for localised unifocal and multifocal prostate cancer: a prospective development study [J].
Ahmed, Hashim U. ;
Hindley, Richard G. ;
Dickinson, Louise ;
Freeman, Alex ;
Kirkham, Alex P. ;
Sahu, Mahua ;
Scott, Rebecca ;
Allen, Clare ;
Van der Meulen, Jan ;
Emberton, Mark .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2012, 13 (06) :622-632
[2]
Transatlantic Consensus Group on active surveillance and focal therapy for prostate cancer [J].
Ahmed, Hashim U. ;
Akin, Oguz ;
Coleman, Jonathan A. ;
Crane, Sarah ;
Emberton, Mark ;
Goldenberg, Larry ;
Hricak, Hedvig ;
Kattan, Mike W. ;
Kurhanewicz, John ;
Moore, Caroline M. ;
Parker, Chris ;
Polascik, Thomas J. ;
Scardino, Peter ;
van As, Nicholas ;
Villers, Arnauld .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 109 (11) :1636-1647
[3]
[Anonymous], 1997, AJCC CANC STAGING MA
[4]
ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012 [J].
Barentsz, Jelle O. ;
Richenberg, Jonathan ;
Clements, Richard ;
Choyke, Peter ;
Verma, Sadhna ;
Villeirs, Geert ;
Rouviere, Olivier ;
Logager, Vibeke ;
Futterer, Jurgen J. .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2012, 22 (04) :746-757
[5]
CALCULATING CORRELATION-COEFFICIENTS WITH REPEATED OBSERVATIONS .2. CORRELATION BETWEEN SUBJECTS [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1995, 310 (6980) :633-633
[6]
Relationship between Apparent Diffusion Coefficients at 3.0-T MR Imaging and Gleason Grade in Peripheral Zone Prostate Cancer [J].
Hambrock, Thomas ;
Somford, Diederik M. ;
Huisman, Henkjan J. ;
van Oort, Inge M. ;
Witjes, J. Alfred ;
Hulsbergen-van de Kaa, Christina A. ;
Scheenen, Thomas ;
Barentsz, Jelle O. .
RADIOLOGY, 2011, 259 (02) :453-461
[7]
Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness: In Vivo Assessment of MR Spectroscopy and Diffusion-weighted Imaging at 3 T [J].
Kobus, Thiele ;
Vos, Pieter C. ;
Hambrock, Thomas ;
De Rooij, Maarten ;
Hulsbergen-Van de Kaa, Christina A. ;
Barentsz, Jelle O. ;
Heerschap, Arend ;
Scheenen, Tom W. J. .
RADIOLOGY, 2012, 265 (02) :457-467
[8]
Intermixed Normal Tissue within Prostate Cancer: Effect on MR Imaging Measurements of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient and T2-Sparse versus Dense Cancers [J].
Langer, Deanna L. ;
van der Kwast, Theodorus H. ;
Evans, Andrew J. ;
Sun, Laibao ;
Yaffe, Martin J. ;
Trachtenberg, John ;
Haider, Masoom A. .
RADIOLOGY, 2008, 249 (03) :900-908
[9]
ZONAL DISTRIBUTION OF PROSTATIC ADENOCARCINOMA - CORRELATION WITH HISTOLOGIC PATTERN AND DIRECTION OF SPREAD [J].
MCNEAL, JE ;
REDWINE, EA ;
FREIHA, FS ;
STAMEY, TA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 1988, 12 (12) :897-906
[10]
Diffusion-Weighted and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI of Prostate Cancer: Correlation of Quantitative MR Parameters With Gleason Score and Tumor Angiogenesis [J].
Oto, Aytekin ;
Yang, Cheng ;
Kayhan, Arda ;
Tretiakova, Maria ;
Antic, Tatjana ;
Schmid-Tannwald, Christine ;
Eggener, Scott ;
Karczmar, Gregory S. ;
Stadler, Walter M. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2011, 197 (06) :1382-1390