Advance preparation in task switching - What work is being done?

被引:99
作者
Altmann, EM [1 ]
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, Dept Psychol, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00729.x
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The preparation effect in task switching is usually interpreted to mean that a switching process makes use of the interval between task-cue onset and trial-stimulus onset (the cue-stimulus interval, or CSI) to accomplish some of its work ahead of time. This study undermines the empirical basis for this interpretation and suggests that task activation, not task switching, is the functional process in cognitive control. Experiments 1 and 2 used an explicit cuing paradigm, and Experiments 3 and 4 used a variation in which the trial after a task cue was followed by several cueless trials, requiring retention of the cue in memory. Experiments 1 and 3 replicated the preparation effect on switch cost, and Experiments 2 and 4 showed that this effect vanishes when CSI is manipulated between subjects, leaving only a main effect of CSI when the task cue is a memory load.
引用
收藏
页码:616 / 622
页数:7
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] ALLPORT A, 1994, ATTENTION PERFORM, V15, P421
  • [2] Allport A., 2000, ATTENTION PERFORM, P35
  • [3] Task switching and the pied homunculus: where are we being led?
    Altmann, EM
    [J]. TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2003, 7 (08) : 340 - 341
  • [4] Forgetting to remember: The functional relationship of decay and interference
    Altmann, EM
    Gray, WD
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2002, 13 (01) : 27 - 33
  • [5] Functional decay of memory for tasks
    Altmann, EM
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH-PSYCHOLOGISCHE FORSCHUNG, 2002, 66 (04): : 287 - 297
  • [6] Memory for goals: an activation-based model
    Altmann, EM
    Trafton, JG
    [J]. COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 2002, 26 (01) : 39 - 83
  • [7] ALTMANN EM, 2004, UNPUB SWITCH COST MO
  • [8] [Anonymous], 1986, Response times
  • [9] ARRINGTON CM, 2002, THESIS MICHIGAN STAT
  • [10] Cohen J., 1988, STAT POWER ANAL BEHA