Preparative two-step purification of recombinant human basic fibroblast growth factor from high-cell-density cultivation of Eschericia coli

Aggregation and precipitation are major pitfalls during bioprocessing and purification of recombinant human basic fibroblast growth factor (rh-bFGF). In order to gain high yields of the soluble protein monomer with high biological activity, an efficient downstream process was developed, focussing on the combination of expanded bed adsorption (EBA) and heparin chromatography, After expression in E. coli TG1:p lambda FGFB, cells were harvested and washed; then the rh-bFGF was released via high pressure homogenization. The high viscosity of the feedstock of about 40 mPa s, showing non-newtonian behaviour, was reduced to 2 mPa s by the addition of DNase. The homogenate (5.6 1) was loaded directly on an expanded bed column (C-50) packed with the strong cation-exchanger Streamline(TM) SP. In the eluates, histone-like (HU) protein was identified as the main protein contaminant by sequence analysis. The thermodynamics and kinetics of rh-bFGF adsorption from the whole broth protein mixture were determined in view of competition and displacement effects with host-derived proteins. Optimal binding and elution conditions were developed with knowledge of the dependence of rh-bFGF adsorption isotherms on the salt concentration to allow direct application of eluates onto Heparin HyperD(TM). This affinity support maintained selectivity and efficiency under CIP and over a wide range of flow-rates; both is advantageous for the flexibility of the purification protocol in view of a scalable process. Remaining DNA and HU protein were separated by Heparin HyperD. The endotoxin level decreased from approximate to 1,000,000 EU/ml in the whole broth to 10 EU in 3 mg bFGF per mi. The final purification protocol yields >99% pure rh-bFGF as judged from SDS-PAGE and MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry with high mitogenic activity (ED50 = 1-1.5 ng/ml) of the lyophilized sample. In comparison to the conventional process, the overall protein recovery rose by 15% to 65% with saving time and costs. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.