A randomized control trial of the effect of negotiated telephone support on glycaemic control in young people with Type 1 diabetes

被引:65
作者
Howells, L
Wilson, AC
Skinner, TC
Newton, R
Morris, AD
Greene, SA [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Dundee, Ninewells Hosp & Med Sch, Tayside Inst Child Hlth, Dundee DD1 9SY, Scotland
[2] Leicester Royal Infirm, Dept Psychol, Leicester, Leics, England
[3] Univ Dundee, Ninewells Hosp & Med Sch, Dept Med, Dundee DD1 9SY, Scotland
关键词
Type; 1; diabetes; self efficacy; adherence; problem solving; adolescence;
D O I
10.1046/j.1464-5491.2002.00791.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aim To evaluate changes in self-efficacy for self-management in young people with Type 1 diabetes participating in a 'Negotiated Telephone Support' (NTS) intervention developed using the principles of problem solving and social learning theory. Methods One-year RCT with 79 young people (male 39; mean age +/- SD 16.5 +/- 3.2 years, duration 6.7 +/- 4.4 years, HbA(1c) 8.6 +/- 1.5%) randomized into: Group 1 (control group), continued routine management, n = 28; Group 2, continued routine management with NTS, n = 25; Group 3, annual clinic with NTS, n = 26. Outcome measures: HbA(1c), self-efficacy, barriers to adherence, problem solving, and diabetes knowledge. Results There were no differences between the groups at baseline. Participants in Groups 2 and 3 received an average of 16 telephone calls/year (range 5-19), median duration 9 min (2-30), with a median interval of 3 weeks (1-24) between calls. Significant correlations were found between age and average length of call (r = 0.44, P < 0.01) and frequency of contact (r = 0.36, P < 0.05). Social and school topics were discussed frequently. After 1 year, while the participants in the two intervention groups showed significant improvements in self-efficacy (P = 0.035), there was no difference in glycaemic control in the three groups. Barriers to insulin use adherence were a significant predictor of HbA(1c) (P < 0.001) after controlling for baseline. Conclusions NTS is an effective medium to deliver a simple theory-based psychological intervention to enhance self-efficacy for diabetes self-management. Reduced clinic attendance, combined with NTS, did not result in a deterioration of HbA(1c). Intensive personal support needs to be combined with intensive diabetes therapy to improve glycaemic control in this age group.
引用
收藏
页码:643 / 648
页数:6
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
Alexander V, 2001, DIABETES CARE, V24, P239
[2]  
Bandura A., 1994, SELF EFFICACY
[3]  
Beeney L.J., 1994, HDB PSYCHOL DIABETES, P159
[4]   Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials - The CONSORT statement [J].
Begg, C ;
Cho, M ;
Eastwood, S ;
Horton, R ;
Moher, D ;
Olkin, I ;
Pitkin, R ;
Rennie, D ;
Schulz, KF ;
Simel, D ;
Stroup, DF .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1996, 276 (08) :637-639
[5]  
BOLTON AJM, 1993, DIABETIC MED, V10, P687
[6]   DORCHYS RECIPES EXPLAINING THE INTRIGUING EFFICACY OF BELGIAN CONVENTIONAL THERAPY [J].
DORCHY, H .
DIABETES CARE, 1994, 17 (05) :458-460
[7]   PROBLEM SOLVING AND BEHAVIOR MODIFICATION [J].
DZURILLA, TJ ;
GOLDFRIED, MR .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1971, 78 (01) :107-+
[8]  
Faul F., 1992, GPOWER PRIORI POSTHO
[9]  
GREENE AC, 1999, DIABETIC MED, V16, P20
[10]   Personal and family factors associated with quality of life in adolescents with diabetes [J].
Grey, M ;
Sullivan-Bolyai, S ;
Boland, EA ;
Tamborlane, WV ;
Yu, C .
DIABETES CARE, 1998, 21 (06) :909-914