A Systematic Review of the Impact of Genetic Counseling on Risk Perception Accuracy

被引:95
作者
Smerecnik, Chris M. R. [1 ]
Mesters, Ilse [1 ]
Verweij, Eline [1 ]
de Vries, Nanne K. [1 ]
de Vries, Hein [1 ]
机构
[1] Maastricht Univ, Sch Publ Hlth & Primary Care Caphri, Dept Hlth Educ & Hlth Promot, Fac Hlth Med & Life Sci, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands
关键词
Genetic counseling; Risk perception; Systematic review; BREAST-CANCER RISK; FAMILY-HISTORY; WOMEN; COMMUNICATION; PROBABILITIES; SATISFACTION; DISTRESS; SERVICES; OUTCOMES; APPEALS;
D O I
10.1007/s10897-008-9210-z
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
This review presents an overview of the impact of genetic counseling on risk perception accuracy in papers published between January 2000 and February 2007. The results suggest that genetic counseling may have a positive impact on risk perception accuracy, though some studies observed no impact at all, or only for low-risk participants. Several implications for future research can be deduced. First, future researchers should link risk perception changes to objective risk estimates, define risk perception accuracy as the correct counseled risk estimate, and report both the proportion of individuals who correctly estimate their risk and the average overestimation of the risk. Second, as the descriptions of the counseling sessions were generally poor, future research should include more detailed description of these sessions and link their content to risk perception outcomes to allow interpretation of the results. Finally, the effect of genetic counseling should be examined for a wider variety of hereditary conditions. Genetic counselors should provide the necessary context in which counselees can understand risk information, use both verbal and numerical risk estimates to communicate personal risk information, and use visual aids when communicating numerical risk information.
引用
收藏
页码:217 / 228
页数:12
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]   Over the counter medicines and the need for immediate action: a further evaluation of European Commission recommended wordings for communicating risk [J].
Berry, D ;
Raynor, T ;
Knapp, P ;
Bersellini, E .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2004, 53 (02) :129-134
[2]   Goals of genetic counseling [J].
Biesecker, BB .
CLINICAL GENETICS, 2001, 60 (05) :323-330
[3]  
Bjortvan C, 2007, J GENET COUNS, V12, P211, DOI DOI 10.1007/S10897-006-9061-4
[4]  
Bowen Deborah J, 2006, Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol, V12, P45, DOI 10.1037/1099-9809.12.1.45
[5]  
Burke W, 2000, AM J MED GENET, V90, P361, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8628(20000228)90:5<361::AID-AJMG4>3.0.CO
[6]  
2-8
[7]   Psychological outcomes and risk perception after genetic testing and counselling in breast cancer: a systematic review [J].
Butow, PN ;
Lobb, EA ;
Meiser, B ;
Barratt, A ;
Tucker, KM .
MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2003, 178 (02) :77-81
[8]   Risk avoidance: Graphs versus numbers [J].
Chua, Hannah Faye ;
Yates, J. Frank ;
Shah, Priti .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 2006, 34 (02) :399-410
[9]   Pregnancy outcome after genetic counselling for prenatal diagnosis of unexpected chromosomal anomaly [J].
Clementi, Maurizio ;
Di Gianantonio, Elena ;
Ponchia, Rossella ;
Petrella, Marilena ;
Andrisani, Alessandra ;
Tenconi, Romano .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2006, 128 (1-2) :77-80
[10]  
Codori Ann-Marie, 2005, J Genet Couns, V14, P119, DOI 10.1007/s10897-005-4062-2