Symmetrical multi-foil shields for reducing spray drift

被引:29
作者
Sidahmed, MM [1 ]
Awadalla, HH
Haidar, MA
机构
[1] Amer Univ Beirut, Fac Agr & Food Sci, Dept Land & Water Resources, Beirut, Lebanon
[2] Amer Univ Beirut, Fac Agr & Food Sci, Dept Plant Sci, Beirut, Lebanon
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2004.04.006
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
In this study, two symmetrical multi-foil shields were designed to minimise spray drift in both upwind and downwind travel directions. One shield was a symmetrical double foil that induced direct air assist (an air jet acting directly on the spray droplets), while the other shield was a symmetrical triple foil that induced both direct air assist and an air curtain (an air jet forming a pneumatic shield in front of or behind the spray nozzle). Wind tunnel experiments were conducted to compare the effectiveness (in terms of drift reduction) of these shields with an upwind-oriented double foil shield, using two different nozzles (8001 and 8003), three levels of pressures (138, 276, and 414kPa), and an average wind tunnel air speed of 6-2ms(-1). A previous study of nine spray shields (that were similar in concept to shields that are commercially available) showed that the best performance in terms of drift reduction was achieved by a double foil shield. This shield, however, was more effective in an upwind than in a downwind travel direction because only in the upwind travel did the shield induce an airflow that formed an air curtain to suppress drift. Although all three shields reduced drift significantly compared to unshielded spraying, overall performances were significantly different from each other (probability P<0.05). The best performance in terms of drift reduction was achieved by the symmetrical triple foil shield (61%), followed by the symmetrical double foil shield (55%), and then the double foil shield (48%). (C) 2004 Silsoe Research Institute. All rights reserved Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:305 / 312
页数:8
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] ALMEKINDERS H, 1993, T ASAE, V36, P321, DOI 10.13031/2013.28342
  • [2] AWADALLA HH, 2001, THESIS AM U BEIRUT B
  • [3] BROWN RB, 1995, P NAT C PEST APPL TE, P97
  • [4] CENOWSKI S, 1994, APPL ENG AGRIC, V10, P471
  • [5] ELDIRANY K, 2000, 001135 ASAE
  • [6] FEHRINGER RJ, 1990, 901008 ASAE
  • [7] FORD RJ, 1984, CAN AGR ENG, V26, P97
  • [8] A COMPARISON OF A SIMPLE BLUFF PLATE AND AXIAL FANS FOR AIR-ASSISTED, HIGH-SPEED, LOW-VOLUME SPRAY APPLICATION TO WHEAT AND SUNFLOWER PLANTS
    FURNESS, GO
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH, 1991, 48 (01): : 57 - 75
  • [9] DROPLET SIZE AND SPRAY PATTERN CHARACTERISTICS OF AN ELECTRONIC FLOW CONTROLLER FOR SPRAY NOZZLES
    GILES, DK
    COMINO, JA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH, 1990, 47 (04): : 249 - 267
  • [10] Lake J. R., 1982, Proceedings British Crop Protection Conference -- Weeds, P1009