Preoperative evaluation of the extrahepatic bile duct structure for laparoscopic cholecystectomy

被引:34
作者
Uchiyama, K. [1 ]
Tani, M. [1 ]
Kawai, M. [1 ]
Ueno, M. [1 ]
Hama, T. [1 ]
Yamaue, H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Wakayama Med Univ, Sch Med, Dept Surg 2, Wakayama 6418510, Japan
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2006年 / 20卷 / 07期
关键词
aberrant cystic ducts; accessory hepatic ducts; bile duct injuries; laparoscopic cholecystectomy; preoperative cholangiography;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-005-0689-1
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The incidence of aberrant bile duct injury associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has not yet been adequately examined. This study aimed to clarify the types of normal cystic ducts and the incidence of aberrant extrahepatic bile ducts, and to search for a method of avoiding injuries during LC. Methods: Aberrant hepatic ducts were retrospectively categorized into five types according to the pattern of the cystic ducts and the accessory hepatic ducts by preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography or multidetector three-dimensional computed tomography using drip infusion cholangiography. The aberrant bile ducts were classified as type A (merging at the right side of the common bile duct), type B (merging at the anterior side), or type C (merging at the posterior left side). Results: The intrahepatic bile ducts and cystic duct were clearly shown for 1,044 of the 1,278 patients who underwent LC. Secondary branches of aberrant cystic ducts were observed in 37 cases (3.5%), and accessory hepatic ducts were observed in 30 cases (2.9%). A comparison of the difficulties encountered with LC for each type based on the merging patterns of cystic ducts showed that type C needed a much longer operation time for LC than the other types. Conclusions: A preoperative evaluation of the bile duct tract and the accessory hepatic duct before LC is important. Patients with a cystic duct merging normally into the posterior left side of the common hepatic duct (type C) experienced difficulty when undergoing LC. The authors have safely performed LC with the use of an endoscopic nasobiliary drainage tube in type D cases (cystic duct merging with the right hepatic duct), in type IV cases (cystic duct merging with an accessory hepatic duct).
引用
收藏
页码:1119 / 1123
页数:5
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
Adamsen S, 1997, J AM COLL SURGEONS, V184, P571
[2]   ACCIDENTAL LESIONS OF THE COMMON BILE-DUCT AT CHOLECYSTECTOMY .2. RESULTS OF TREATMENT [J].
ANDRENSANDBERG, A ;
JOHANSSON, S ;
BENGMARK, S .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1985, 201 (04) :452-455
[3]  
BERCI G, 1995, J AM COLL SURGEONS, V180, P765
[4]   Post-ERCP pancreatitis and hyperamylasemia: Patient-related and operative risk factors [J].
Christoforidis, E ;
Goulimaris, I ;
Kanellos, I ;
Tsalis, K ;
Demetriades, C ;
Betsis, D .
ENDOSCOPY, 2002, 34 (04) :286-292
[5]  
Dwerryhouse SJ, 1998, BRIT J SURG, V85, P1364
[6]   Intraoperative cholangiography is still indicated after preoperative endoscopic cholangiography for gallstone disease [J].
Edye, M ;
Dalvi, A ;
Canin-Endres, J ;
Baskin-Bey, E ;
Salky, B .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2002, 16 (05) :799-802
[7]   Three-dimensional spiral CT cholangiography in patients with suspected obstructive biliary disease: Comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography [J].
Fleischmann, D ;
Ringl, H ;
Schofl, R ;
Potzi, R ;
Kontrus, M ;
Henk, C ;
Bankier, AA ;
Kettenbach, J ;
Mostbeck, GH .
RADIOLOGY, 1996, 198 (03) :861-868
[8]   Endoscopic nasobiliary drainage for bile duct injury after laparoscopic cholecystectomy [J].
Hanazaki, K ;
Sodeyama, H ;
Sode, Y ;
Miyazawa, M ;
Yokoyama, S ;
Wakabayashi, M ;
Kawamura, N ;
Ohtsuka, M ;
Miyazaki, T ;
Matsuda, Y .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 1997, 11 (11) :1123-1125
[9]  
HASHMONAI M, 1995, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V130, P673
[10]   Evaluation of aberrant bile ducts before laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Helical CT cholangiography versus MR cholangiography [J].
Hirao, K ;
Miyazaki, A ;
Fujimoto, T ;
Isomoto, I ;
Hayashi, K .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2000, 175 (03) :713-720