Impact of extensive intraductal component on recurrence and survival in patients with stage I or II breast cancer treated with breast conservation therapy

被引:28
作者
Hurd, TC
Sneige, N
Allen, PK
Strom, EA
McNeese, MD
Babiera, GV
Singletary, SE
机构
[1] UNIV TEXAS, SW MED CTR, DEPT SURG, DALLAS, TX 75235 USA
[2] UNIV TEXAS, MD ANDERSON CANC CTR, DEPT PATHOL, HOUSTON, TX 77030 USA
[3] UNIV TEXAS, MD ANDERSON CANC CTR, DEPT SURG ONCOL, HOUSTON, TX 77030 USA
[4] UNIV TEXAS, MD ANDERSON CANC CTR, DEPT RADIAT ONCOL, HOUSTON, TX 77030 USA
关键词
extensive intraductal component; breast cancer; survival rates; recurrence rates; local control; breast conservation therapy;
D O I
10.1007/BF02303793
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: The relationship between an extensive intraductal component (EIC) and recurrence and survival in patients with stage I or II breast cancer treated with breast conservation therapy has not been clearly defined. Methods: 133 patients with stage I or II breast cancer who underwent breast conservation therapy between 1978 and 1990 at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center were retrospectively studied. All pathology slides were reviewed to determine tumor size, nuclear grade, extent of intraductal component, number of positive lymph nodes, and histologic margins, EIC was defined as ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) occupying 25% or more of the area encompassed by the infiltrating tumor and DCIS present in grossly normal adjacent breast tissue, Results: 110 patients are alive, and 23 have died, with a median follow-up of 7 years; 85 of 133 patients had an intraductal component, but only 18 had an EIC, Locoregional control and disease-free and overall survival were not adversely affected by the presence of an EIC. Five of 133 patients had a locoregional recurrence, but only one had an EIC. Conclusions: EIC, if negative margins can be achieved, does not adversely affect disease-free or overall survival or local control rates.
引用
收藏
页码:119 / 124
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
ABE O, 1995, NEW ENGL J MED, V333, P1444
[2]  
AHMED S, 1996, BREAST DIS, V8, P1
[3]  
BALCH CM, 1993, ANN SURG, V217, P207
[4]   EARLY BREAST-CANCER - PREDICTORS OF BREAST RECURRENCE FOR PATIENTS TREATED WITH CONSERVATIVE SURGERY AND RADIATION-THERAPY [J].
BOYAGES, J ;
RECHT, A ;
CONNOLLY, JL ;
SCHNITT, SJ ;
GELMAN, R ;
KOOY, H ;
LOVE, S ;
OSTEEN, RT ;
CADY, B ;
SILVER, B ;
HARRIS, JR .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1990, 19 (01) :29-41
[5]   IDENTIFICATION OF PATIENTS WHO ARE AT HIGH-RISK FOR LOCOREGIONAL BREAST-CANCER RECURRENCE AFTER CONSERVATIVE SURGERY AND RADIOTHERAPY - A REVIEW ARTICLE FOR SURGEONS, PATHOLOGISTS, AND RADIATION AND MEDICAL ONCOLOGISTS [J].
CLARKE, DH ;
MARTINEZ, AA .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1992, 10 (03) :474-483
[6]  
EBERLEIN TJ, 1990, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V125, P771
[7]   REANALYSIS AND RESULTS AFTER 12 YEARS OF FOLLOW-UP IN A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL COMPARING TOTAL MASTECTOMY WITH LUMPECTOMY WITH OR WITHOUT IRRADIATION IN THE TREATMENT OF BREAST-CANCER [J].
FISHER, B ;
ANDERSON, S ;
REDMOND, CK ;
WOLMARK, N ;
WICKERHAM, DL ;
CRONIN, WM .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1995, 333 (22) :1456-1461
[8]  
FISHER ER, 1986, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V57, P1717, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19860501)57:9<1717::AID-CNCR2820570902>3.0.CO
[9]  
2-H
[10]  
FISHER ER, 1992, SEMIN SURG ONCOL, V8, P161