The pH 6.7 Syrian hamster embryo cell transformation assay for assessing the carcinogenic potential of chemicals

Cell transformation models have been established for studying the cellular and molecular basis of the neoplastic process. Transformation models have also been utilized extensively for studying mechanisms of chemical carcinogenesis and, to a lesser degree, screening chemicals for their carcinogenic potential. Complexities associated with the conduct of cell transformation assays have been a significant factor in discouraging broad use of this approach despite their reported good predictivity for carcinogenicity. We previously reported that many of the experimental difficulties with the Syrian hamster embryo (SHE) cell transformation assay could be reduced or eliminated by culturing these cells at pH 6.7 culture conditions compared to the historically used pH 7.1-7.3. We and others have shown that morphological transformation (MT), the earliest recognizable phenotype in the multi-step transformation process and the endpoint used in the standard assay to indicate a chemical's transforming activity, represents a pre-neoplastic stage in this model system. In the collaborative study reported here, in which approx. 50% of the chemicals were tested under code in one laboratory (Hazelton) and the other 50% evaluated by several investigators in the second laboratory (P & G), we have evaluated 56 chemicals (30 carcinogens, 18 non-carcinogens, 8 of inconclusive carcinogenic activity) in the SHE cell transformation assay conducted at pH 6.7 culture conditions with a standardized, Good Laboratory Practices-quality protocol. An overall concordance of 85% (41/48) between SHE cell transformation and rodent bioassay results was observed with assay sensitivity of 87% (26/30) and specificity of 83% (15/18), respectively. The assay exhibited a sensitivity of 78% (14/18) for Salmonella assay negative carcinogens, supporting its value for detecting non-mutagenic carcinogens. For maximum assay sensitivity, two exposure durations were required, namely a 24-h exposure and a 7-day exposure assay. Depending on the duration of chemical treatment required to induce transformation, insight into the mechanism of transformation induction may also be gained. Based on the data reported here, as well as the larger historical dataset reviewed by Isfort et al. (1996), we conclude that the SHE cell transformation assay provides an improved method for screening chemicals for carcinogenicity relative to current standard genotoxicity assays.