Recurrence of pulmonary vein conduction and atrial fibrillation after pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation: A randomized trial of the ostial versus the extraostial ablation strategy

被引:93
作者
Nilsson, Brian
Chen, Xu
Pehrson, Steen
Kober, Lars
Hilden, Jorgen
Svendsen, Jesper H.
机构
[1] Univ Copenhagen Hosp, Rigshosp, Dept Cardiol, Ctr Heart, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
[2] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Biostat, Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.ahj.2006.05.029
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Both segmental ostial and circumferential extraostial pulmonary vein (PV) isolation have been proven effective in the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the recurrence of AF and PV conduction after the 2 ablation strategies has never been compared in a randomized study. Methods A total of 100 consecutive patients (age 56 +/- 10; 71 men) with symptomatic AF (paroxysmal, 5 1; persistent, 49) were randomized to segmental ostial (n = 54) or circumferential extraostial (n = 46) PV isolation. A circular catheter positioned at the ostium of each target PV guided the ostial PV isolation. Extraostial PV isolation was performed by encircling the paired left and right PVs, respectively, guided by an electroanotomic mapping system. Results A total of 84% of the patients had recurrent AF after the first PV isolation procedure, showing 72% with AF and 12% with organized left atrial tachycardia. In patients undergoing reablation, all but 2 patients had recurrence of left atrium PV conduction (> 95%). During a mean follow-up of 12 months without antiarrhythmic medication, 57% of patients who underwent extraostial PV isolation were free of arrhythmia symptoms compared with 31% of patients who underwent ostial PV isolation (P <.05). This difference in success rate between the 2 ablation strategies was mainly seen in patients known with persistent AF (52% and 15%, respectively; P =.02) as opposed to patients with paroxysmal AF (65% and 46%, respectively; P = .26). Conclusions Overall, the more proximal, extraostial PV isolation was found to be superior to ostial PV isolation, especially in patients known with persistent AF. A high recurrence rate of 84% after a single complete PV isolation procedure was seen. At reablation, more than 95% had recurrence of left atrium PV conduction regardless of the procedure used, supporting the idea that complete PV isolation seems essential to prevent arrhythmia recurrences.
引用
收藏
页码:537.e1 / 537.e8
页数:8
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Electrical, contractile and structural remodeling during atrial fibrillation [J].
Allessie, M ;
Ausma, J ;
Schotten, U .
CARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCH, 2002, 54 (02) :230-246
[2]   Pulmonary vein ablation for idiopathic atrial fibrillation: six month outcome of first procedure in 100 consecutive patients [J].
Bourke, JP ;
Dunuwille, A ;
O'Donnell, D ;
Jamieson, S ;
Furniss, SS .
HEART, 2005, 91 (01) :51-57
[3]   Prospective assessment of late conduction recurrence across radiofrequency lesions producing electrical disconnection at the pulmonary vein ostium in patients with atrial fibrillation [J].
Cappato, R ;
Negroni, S ;
Pecora, D ;
Bentivegna, S ;
Lupo, PP ;
Carolei, A ;
Esposito, C ;
Furlanello, F ;
De Ambroggi, L .
CIRCULATION, 2003, 108 (13) :1599-1604
[4]   Pulmonary vein isolation for the treatment of atrial fibrillation in patients with impaired systolic function [J].
Chen, MS ;
Marrouche, NF ;
Khaykin, Y ;
Gillinov, AM ;
Wazni, O ;
Martin, DO ;
Rossillo, A ;
Verma, A ;
Cummings, J ;
Erciyes, D ;
Saad, E ;
Bhargava, M ;
Bash, D ;
Schweikert, R ;
Burkhardt, D ;
Williams-Andrews, M ;
Perez-Lugones, A ;
Abdul-Karim, A ;
Saliba, W ;
Natale, A .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2004, 43 (06) :1004-1009
[5]   Prevalence, mechanism, and clinical significance of macroreentrant atrial tachycardia during and following left trial ablation for atrial fibrillation [J].
Chugh, A ;
Oral, H ;
Lemola, K ;
Hall, B ;
Cheung, P ;
Good, E ;
Tamirisa, K ;
Han, J ;
Bogun, F ;
Pelosi, F ;
Morady, F .
HEART RHYTHM, 2005, 2 (05) :464-471
[6]   Circumferential mapping and electric isolation of pulmonary veins in patients with atrial fibrillation [J].
Deisenhofer, I ;
Schneider, MAE ;
Böhlen-Knauf, M ;
Zrenner, B ;
Ndrepepa, G ;
Schmieder, S ;
Weber, S ;
Schreieck, J ;
Weyerbrock, S ;
Schmitt, C .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2003, 91 (02) :159-163
[7]  
Ernst S, 2003, J AM COLL CARDIOL, V42, P1271, DOI 10.1016/S0735-1097(03)00940-9
[8]   Clinical outcome after radiofrequency catheter ablation of focal atrial fibrillation triggers [J].
Gerstenfeld, EP ;
Guerra, P ;
Sparks, PB ;
Hattori, K ;
Lesh, MD .
JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2001, 12 (08) :900-908
[9]   Incidence and location of focal atrial fibrillation triggers in patients undergoing repeat pulmonary vein isolation: Implications for ablation strategies [J].
Gerstenfeld, ER ;
Callans, DJ ;
Dixit, S ;
Zado, E ;
Marchlinski, FE .
JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2003, 14 (07) :685-690
[10]   Electrophysiological end point for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation initiated from multiple pulmonary venous foci [J].
Haïssaguerre, M ;
Jaïs, P ;
Shah, DC ;
Garrigue, S ;
Takahashi, A ;
Lavergne, T ;
Hocini, M ;
Peng, JT ;
Roudaut, R ;
Clementy, J .
CIRCULATION, 2000, 101 (12) :1409-1417