What is the philosophy of information?

被引:105
作者
Floridi, L [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford Wolfson Coll, Fac Philos, Dept Comp Sci, Oxford OX2 6UD, England
关键词
computation; cyberphilosophy; dialectic; digital philosophy; information; information technology; information society; information-theoretic methodology; innovation; philosophy of AI; philosophy of computer science; philosophy of computing; philosophy of information; scholasticism;
D O I
10.1111/1467-9973.00221
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
Computational and information-theoretic research in philosophy has become increasingly fertile and pervasive, giving rise to a wealth of interesting results. In consequence, a new and vitally important field has emerged, the philosophy of information (PIP. This essay is the first attempt to analyse the nature of PI systematically. PI is defined as the philosophical field concerned with the critical investigation of the conceptual nature and basic principles of information, including its dynamics, utilisation, and sciences, and the elaboration and application of information-theoretic and computational methodologies to philosophical problems. I argue that PI is a mature discipline for three reasons; it represents an autonomous field of research; it provides an innovative approach to both traditional and new philosophical topics; and it can stand beside other branches of philosophy, offering a systematic treatment of the conceptual foundations of the world of information and the information society.
引用
收藏
页码:123 / 145
页数:23
相关论文
共 52 条
  • [1] ADLER M, 1979, LONG ISLAND NEW 1118
  • [2] ANDERSON AR, 1964, MINDS MACHINES
  • [3] [Anonymous], PHILOS PAPERS
  • [4] [Anonymous], [No title captured]
  • [5] [Anonymous], 1993, COLLECTED PAPERS CLA
  • [6] BARHILLEL Y, 1964, LANGUAGE INFORMATION
  • [7] BODEN MA, 1984, STUDY INFO INTERDISC
  • [8] BODEN MA, 1990, PHILOS ARTIFICIAL IT
  • [9] Bolter J.David., 1984, TURINGS MAN W CULTUR
  • [10] DEFINING INFORMATION - AN APPROACH FOR POLICYMAKERS
    BRAMAN, S
    [J]. TELECOMMUNICATIONS POLICY, 1989, 13 (03) : 233 - 242