Adversarial legalism and transaction costs: The industrial-flight hypothesis revisited

被引：20

作者：

Anderson, CL

Kagan, RA

机构：

[1] Carleton Univ, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada

[2] Univ Washington, Daniel J Evans Sch Publ Affairs, Seattle, WA 98195 USA

[3] Univ Calif Berkeley, Ctr Study Law & Soc, Sch Law, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA

来源：

关键词：

international; law and economics;

D O I：

10.1016/S0144-8188(00)00018-1

中图分类号：

F [经济];

学科分类号：

02 ;

摘要：

[No abstract available]

引用

页码：1 / 19

页数：19

共 57 条

[1]

ANDERSON CL, 1996, ADVERSARIAL LEGALISM

[2]

[Anonymous], YALE J REGULATION

[3]

[Anonymous], 1994, DUTCH LEGAL CULTURE

[4]

[Anonymous], 1993, MEXICO US FREE TRADE

[5]

[Anonymous], 1980, TORTOISE HARE CLEAN

[6]

Atiyah P.S., 1987, FORM SUBSTANCE ANGLO

[7]

BAITHWAITE J, 1985, PUNISH PERSUADE ENFO

BARBERA, AJ ;

MCCONNELL, VD .

[9]

BARDACH E, 1982, GOING BY BOOK PROBLE

[10]

BARTICK TJ, 1991, WHO BENEFITS STATE L