The contributions of verb bias and plausibility to the comprehension of temporarily ambiguous sentences

被引:402
作者
Garnsey, SM
Pearlmutter, NJ
Myers, E
Lotocky, MA
机构
[1] NORTHEASTERN UNIV, BOSTON, MA 02115 USA
[2] QUEEN VALLEY HOSP, NAPA, CA USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
D O I
10.1006/jmla.1997.2512
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
Eyetracking and the self-paced moving-window reading paradigm were used in two experiments examining the contributions of both frequency-based verb biases and the plausibility of particular word combinations to the comprehension of temporarily ambiguous sentences. The temporary ambiguity concerned whether a noun following a verb was its direct object (The senator regretted the decision immediately.), or instead the subject of an embedded clause (The senator regretted the decision had been made public.). The experiments crossed the plausibility of the temporarily ambiguous noun as a direct object (e.g., The senator regretted the decision ... vs The senator regretted the reporter ...) with verb bias, eliminating a confound present in earlier research and allowing an examination of interactions between the two factors. Unbiased verbs were included as well to evaluate the role of plausibility in the absence of verb bias. The results generally replicated Trueswell, Tanenhaus, and Kello's (1993) finding that verb bias has rapid effects on ambiguity resolution, and showed in addition that verb bias and plausibility interact during comprehension. The results are most consistent with parallel interactive models of language comprehension such as constraint satisfaction models. (C) 1997 Academic Press.
引用
收藏
页码:58 / 93
页数:36
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]   INTERACTION WITH CONTEXT DURING HUMAN SENTENCE PROCESSING [J].
ALTMANN, G ;
STEEDMAN, M .
COGNITION, 1988, 30 (03) :191-238
[2]   AVOIDING THE GARDEN PATH - EYE-MOVEMENTS IN CONTEXT [J].
ALTMANN, GTM ;
GARNHAM, A ;
DENNIS, Y .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 1992, 31 (05) :685-712
[3]  
BOLAND E, IN PRESS J MEMORY LA
[4]   Verb argument structure in parsing and interpretation: Evidence from wh-questions [J].
Boland, JE ;
Tanenhaus, MK ;
Garnsey, SM ;
Carlson, GN .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 1995, 34 (06) :774-806
[5]   PARSING IN DISCOURSE - CONTEXT EFFECTS AND THEIR LIMITS [J].
BRITT, MA ;
PERFETTI, CA ;
GARROD, S ;
RAYNER, K .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 1992, 31 (03) :293-314
[6]   THE INTERACTION OF REFERENTIAL AMBIGUITY AND ARGUMENT STRUCTURE IN THE PARSING OF PREPOSITIONAL PHRASES [J].
BRITT, MA .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 1994, 33 (02) :251-283
[7]  
CLARK HH, 1973, J VERB LEARN VERB BE, V12, P355
[8]   PARSING ARGUMENTS - PHRASE STRUCTURE AND ARGUMENT STRUCTURE AS DETERMINANTS OF INITIAL PARSING DECISIONS [J].
CLIFTON, C ;
SPEER, S ;
ABNEY, SP .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 1991, 30 (02) :251-271
[9]  
Cohen J., 1983, APPLIED MULTIPLE REG
[10]   VERB FRAME PREFERENCES - DESCRIPTIVE NORMS [J].
CONNINE, C ;
FERREIRA, F ;
JONES, C ;
CLIFTON, C ;
FRAZIER, L .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLINGUISTIC RESEARCH, 1984, 13 (04) :307-319