Female sex: a protective role in suspected mycordial ischemia

被引:3
作者
Henrikson, Charles A. [1 ]
Howell, Eric E. [1 ]
Bush, David E. [1 ]
Chandra-Strobos, Nish [1 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Med Inst, Dept Med, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
关键词
cardiac testing; chest pain; outcomes; sex;
D O I
10.1097/00019501-200603000-00009
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Women are felt to have poor outcomes in coronary artery disease, largely on the basis of secondary observations in acute coronary syndrome trials. We sought to examine the neglected topic of sex differences in workup and outcomes in the general population presenting with chest pain. We examined 439 consecutive patients admitted via the emergency department with ongoing chest pain. Cardiac testing was defined as any cardiac catheterization or stress test. Positive testing was defined as a 70% or greater stenosis in an epicardial coronary artery on catheterization, or a positive stress test result. Follow-up was obtained via telephone contact at 4 months following discharge. Further cardiac testing was deemed necessary in 68% (164/241) of women and 77% (153/198) of men (P = 0.038). Among women undergoing further testing, only 21% (35/164) had positive tests, whereas 41% (62/153) of men had positive tests (P = 0.002). At 4 months, women were less likely to have suffered the combined endpoint of subsequent myocardial infarction, revascularization, or death, than men (15 vs 23%, P = 0.027). Events were more likely to occur in patients who had further testing, and especially in those who had positive testing. These data suggest that women admitted with chest pain are less likely to have active coronary artery disease, and much less likely to have poor outcomes at 4 months than men. This apparent 'gender protection' effect warrants further study.
引用
收藏
页码:153 / 158
页数:6
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
*AM HEART ASS, 2001, 2002 HEART STROK STA
[2]   DIFFERENCES IN THE USE OF PROCEDURES BETWEEN WOMEN AND MEN HOSPITALIZED FOR CORONARY HEART-DISEASE [J].
AYANIAN, JZ ;
EPSTEIN, AM .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1991, 325 (04) :221-225
[3]   Observations of the treatment of women in the United States with myocardial infarction - A report from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction-I [J].
Chandra, NC ;
Ziegelstein, RC ;
Rogers, WJ ;
Tiefenbrunn, AJ ;
Gore, JM ;
French, WJ ;
Rubison, M .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1998, 158 (09) :981-988
[4]   Treatment of acute myocardial infarction and 30-day mortality among women and men. [J].
Gan, SC ;
Beaver, SK ;
Houck, PM ;
MacLehose, RF ;
Lawson, HW ;
Chan, L .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2000, 343 (01) :8-15
[5]   Chest pain relief by nitroglycerin does not predict active coronary artery disease [J].
Hendrikson, CA ;
Howell, EE ;
Bush, DE ;
Miles, JS ;
Meininger, GR ;
Friedlander, T ;
Bushnell, AC ;
Chandra-Strobos, N .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2003, 139 (12) :979-986
[6]   Sex, clinical presentation, and outcome in patients with acute coronary syndromes [J].
Hochman, JS ;
Tamis, JE ;
Thompson, TD ;
Weaver, WD ;
White, HD ;
Van de Werf, F ;
Aylward, P ;
Topol, EJ ;
Califf, RM .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1999, 341 (04) :226-232
[7]   Acute coronary syndromes - Does sex matter? [J].
Hochman, JS ;
Tamis-Holland, JE .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2002, 288 (24) :3161-3164
[8]   Sex differences in outcomes after cardiac catheterization - Effect modification by treatment strategy and time [J].
King, KM ;
Ghali, WA ;
Faris, PD ;
Curtis, MJ ;
Galbraith, PD ;
Graham, MM ;
Knudtson, ML .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2004, 291 (10) :1220-1225
[9]   Women's early warning symptoms of acute myocardial infarction [J].
McSweeney, JC ;
Cody, M ;
O'Sullivan, P ;
Elberson, K ;
Moser, DK ;
Garvin, BJ .
CIRCULATION, 2003, 108 (21) :2619-2623
[10]   Sex-based analysis of outcome in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated predominantly with percutaneous coronary intervention [J].
Mehilli, J ;
Kastrati, A ;
Dirschinger, J ;
Pache, J ;
Seyfarth, M ;
Blasini, R ;
Hall, D ;
Neumann, FJ ;
Schömig, A .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2002, 287 (02) :210-215