Polynesian seafaring and American horizons: A response to Jones and Klar

被引：12

作者：

Anderson, Atholl ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Australian Natl Univ, Dept Archaeol & Nat Hist, Res Sch Pacific & Asian Studies, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia

来源：

AMERICAN ANTIQUITY | 2006年 / 71卷 / 04期

关键词：

D O I：

10.2307/40035888

中图分类号：

Q98 [人类学];

学科分类号：

030303 ;

摘要：

The hypothesis presented by Jones and Klar (2005) that elements of prehistoric Chumash technology and language arrived from East Polynesia is considered. Trans-oceanic diffusion in general should not be rejected out of hand, but in this case it is improbable that it involved East Polynesia. There are substantial differences in the sewn-plank canoes at issue and the compound hooks are of a general form that is not confined to Polynesia. The chronology of East Polynesian colonization is probably too late for diffusion to southern California before A.D. 700. East Polynesian seafaring may have been inadequate to reach the Californian coast. If the explanation is diffusionary, then a source in East Asia is more plausible.

引用

页码：759 / 763

页数：5

共 29 条

[1]

ANDERSON A, 1995, J POLYNESIAN SOC, V104, P110

[2] Faunal collapse, landscape change and settlement history in Remote Oceania [J].

Anderson, A .

WORLD ARCHAEOLOGY, 2002, 33 (03) :375-390

[3]

Anderson A, 2001, PACIFIC 2000: PROCEEDINGS OF THE FIFTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EASTER ISLAND AND THE PACIFIC, P29

[4]

Anderson A, 2000, MOD QUAT RE, V16, P13

[5]

ANDERSON A, 2003, PACIFIC ARCHAEOLOGY, V15, P71

[6]

ANDERSON A, 1986, UNPUB CATALOGUE JOMO

[7]

Anderson AJ, 2002, ASIAN PERSPECT, V41, P242, DOI DOI 10.1353/ASI.2003.0002

[8] Relatedness and investment children in South Africa [J].

Anderson, KG .

HUMAN NATURE-AN INTERDISCIPLINARY BIOSOCIAL PERSPECTIVE, 2005, 16 (01) :1-31

[9]

[Anonymous], 2003, COLONIZATION UNFAMIL

[10]

[Anonymous], AUSTR ARCHAEOLOGIST

← 1 2 3 →