ICPC as a standard classification in Norway

被引:58
作者
Brage, S
Bentsen, BG
Bjerkedal, T
Nygard, JF
Tellnes, G
机构
[1] Inst. of Gen. Pract. and Comm. Med., University of Oslo, 0317 Oslo, PB 1130, Blindern
[2] National Insurance Administration, Oslo
关键词
ICPC; medical classification; sickness certification; general practice;
D O I
10.1093/fampra/13.4.391
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background. The International Classification for Primary Care (ICPC) has been the standard classification for diagnoses on sickness certificates and bills for services to the National Insurance Administration in Norway since 1992. Coding according to ICPC is compulsory for all general practitioners. Objective. The objective of the present study was to describe the introduction of ICPC in Norway, to comment on introduction problems, and to examine the compliance and validity of coding. Methods. The study was based on statistics for episodes of sickness certification in the National Benefit Absence Register. Results. In 1994, the underlying medical diagnosis was coded in 98% of the sickness absence episodes lasting more than 2 weeks. Component 1 codes (symptom codes) were used in 23% of episodes, compared with 26-31% in practice studies. Conclusions. ICPC-coded data in a large Norwegian register appear promising. Most doctors do accurate and careful work in coding, and data appear to be of acceptable quality for further analysis. It is a matter of concern, however, that as many as 23% of episodes had component 1 codes, since these certificates were issued during follow-up encounters. The introduction of ICPC coding has enabled researchers to use diagnoses in the analyses of sickness absence. The growing use of ICPC in general practice has made multi-practice studies possible. The introduction of criteria is mandatory for the improvement of validity in diagnostic coding.
引用
收藏
页码:391 / 396
页数:6
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
Bentsen B G, 1986, Scand J Prim Health Care, V4, P43, DOI 10.3109/02813438609013970
[2]  
BENTSEN BG, 1995, INFFORING BRUK ICPC
[3]  
BENTSEN BG, 1991, ICPC ICHPPC 2 DEFINE
[4]  
BENTZEN N, 1995, FAM PRACT, V12, P341, DOI 10.1093/fampra/12.3.341
[5]  
Brage S, 1992, Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, V112, P2656
[6]  
CLAUSSEN B, 1993, TIDSSKR NOR LAEGEFOR, V114, P821
[7]  
FORES M, 1993, INT CLASSIFICATION P
[8]  
Grimsmo Anders, 1994, Tidsskrift for den Norske Laegeforening, V114, P1983
[9]  
HANNO TV, 1994, TIDSSKR NOR LAEGEFOR, V114, P711
[10]  
HJORTDAHL P, 1986, SCAND J PRIM HLTH CA, V4, P1