Can green consumerism replace environmental regulation? - a differentiated-products example

被引:99
作者
Eriksson, C [1 ]
机构
[1] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Econ, S-75007 Uppsala, Sweden
关键词
green consumerism; product differentiation; technology adoption;
D O I
10.1016/j.reseneeco.2003.10.001
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper assumes that consumers are willing to pay an extra premium for a good if it has a low impact on the environment. We examine if a little dose of such idealistic behavior has a large impact on the market equilibrium, and to what extent it can replace the environmental regulation. The analysis is carried out in a model with product differentiation, where consumers differ in their preferences for product quality. Consumers' willingness to pay the environmental premium may be uniformly or non-uniformly distributed. Green consumerism will only be modestly influential in both cases, despite the fact that product differentiation leads to relaxed competition and increased profits, and thereby creates leverage. (C) 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:281 / 293
页数:13
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   GIVING WITH IMPURE ALTRUISM - APPLICATIONS TO CHARITY AND RICARDIAN EQUIVALENCE [J].
ANDREONI, J .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1989, 97 (06) :1447-1458
[2]   Toward a theoretical model of voluntary overcompliance [J].
Arora, S ;
Gangopadhyay, S .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 1995, 28 (03) :289-309
[3]  
BERGSTROM TC, 1995, AM ECON REV, V85, P58
[4]  
BLANCHARD OJ, 1987, AM ECON REV, V77, P647
[5]  
BOVENBERG L, 2001, HDB PUBLIC EC, V3, pCH23
[6]  
Cairncross F., 1992, COSTING EARTH, VVolume 242
[7]   On the taxation of polluting products in a differentiated industry [J].
Cremer, H ;
Thisse, JF .
EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1999, 43 (03) :575-594
[8]  
DIXIT A, 1994, INVESTMENT UNDER UNC
[9]   PREEMPTION AND RENT EQUALIZATION IN THE ADOPTION OF NEW TECHNOLOGY [J].
FUDENBERG, D ;
TIROLE, J .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 1985, 52 (03) :383-401
[10]   STABILITY IN COMPETITION [J].
Hotelling, Harold .
ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 1929, 39 (153) :41-57