Effective implementation of the ε-constraint method in Multi-Objective Mathematical Programming problems

被引:1824
作者
Mavrotas, George [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Tech Univ Athens, Lab Ind & Energy Econ, Sch Chem Engn, Athens 15780, Greece
关键词
Multi-Objective Programming; epsilon-Constraint method; GAMS; EFFICIENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.amc.2009.03.037
中图分类号
O29 [应用数学];
学科分类号
070104 [应用数学];
摘要
As indicated by the most widely accepted classification, the Multi-Objective Mathematical Programming (MOMP) methods can be classified as a priori, interactive and a posteriori, according to the decision stage in which the decision maker expresses his/her preferences. Although the a priori methods are the most popular, the interactive and the a posteriori methods convey much more information to the decision maker. Especially, the a posteriori (or generation) methods give the whole picture (i.e. the Pareto set) to the decision maker, before his/her final choice, reinforcing thus, his/her confidence to the final decision. However, the generation methods are the less popular due to their computational effort and the lack of widely available software. The present work is an effort to effectively implement the epsilon-constraint method for producing the Pareto optimal solutions in a MOMP. We propose a novel version of the method (augmented epsilon-constraint method - AUGMECON) that avoids the production of weakly Pareto optimal solutions and accelerates the whole process by avoiding redundant iterations. The method AUGMECON has been implemented in GAMS, a widely used modelling language, and has already been used in some applications. Finally, an interactive approach that is based on AUGMECON and eventually results in the most preferred Pareto optimal solution is also proposed in the paper. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:455 / 465
页数:11
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]
[Anonymous], 2002, Journal of MultiCriteria Decision Analysis
[2]
Belton Valerie., 2002, Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: An Integrated Approach, DOI [10.1007/978-1-4615-1495-4, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4615-1495-4]
[3]
Brooke Anthony., 1998, A User's Guide
[4]
Chankong V., 2008, MULTIOBJECTIVE DECIS
[5]
Cohon J.L., 1978, Multiobjective programming and planning
[6]
Ehrgott M, 2005, INT SER OPER RES MAN, V78, P667, DOI 10.1007/0-387-23081-5_17
[7]
Figueira J, 2005, INT SER OPER RES MAN, V78, P133, DOI 10.1007/0-387-23081-5_4
[8]
Finding representative systems for discrete bicriterion optimization problems [J].
Hamacher, Horst W. ;
Pedersen, Christian Roed ;
Ruzika, Stefan .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH LETTERS, 2007, 35 (03) :336-344
[9]
Hwang C. L., 1979, Multiple objective decision makingmethods and applications. A state of the art survey
[10]
COMPUTATIONAL EXPERIENCE CONCERNING PAYOFF TABLES AND MINIMUM CRITERION VALUES OVER THE EFFICIENT SET [J].
ISERMANN, H ;
STEUER, RE .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1988, 33 (01) :91-97