A cost-benefit analysis of R&D tax incentives

被引:25
作者
Russo, B [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Belk Coll Business Adm, Dept Econ, Charlotte, NC 28223 USA
来源
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS-REVUE CANADIENNE D ECONOMIQUE | 2004年 / 37卷 / 02期
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.0008-4085.2004.854954554284.x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Although technical knowledge generates spillover benefits, production of technical knowledge creates congestion externalities; thus, private R&D investment could be inefficient. A computable general equilibrium model is used to rank tax incentives by their effects on research effort and measure welfare effects. Five results stand out: R&D tax credits produce relatively large increases in research effort and welfare. Lower corporate income tax rates and ITCs for downstream users of high-tech production inputs rank second. Revenue losses from lower personal income tax rates can produce welfare losses. Ironically, ITCs for upstream producers of innovative inputs are ineffective. Incremental R&D credits dominate comprehensive credits.
引用
收藏
页码:313 / 335
页数:23
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   A MODEL OF GROWTH THROUGH CREATIVE DESTRUCTION [J].
AGHION, P ;
HOWITT, P .
ECONOMETRICA, 1992, 60 (02) :323-351
[2]  
AGHION P, 1998, ENDOGENEOUS GROWTH T
[3]   THE ECONOMIC-IMPLICATIONS OF LEARNING BY DOING [J].
ARROW, KJ .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 1962, 29 (80) :155-173
[4]   IS PUBLIC-EXPENDITURE PRODUCTIVE [J].
ASCHAUER, DA .
JOURNAL OF MONETARY ECONOMICS, 1989, 23 (02) :177-200
[5]  
Barro R., 1999, EC GROWTH, Vfirst
[6]  
Billings BA, 2001, R&D MANAGE, V31, P465
[7]   Do R&D tax credits work? Evidence from a panel of countries 1979-1997 [J].
Bloom, N ;
Griffith, R ;
Van Reenen, J .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2002, 85 (01) :1-31
[8]   INTERNATIONAL R-AND-D SPILLOVERS [J].
COE, DT ;
HELPMAN, E .
EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1995, 39 (05) :859-887
[9]  
*DEP FIN CAN, 1997, REP TECHN COMM BUS T
[10]  
*DEP FIN CAN, 1997, FED SYST INC TAX INC