Consensus on the use of neurophysiological tests in the intensive care unit (ICU): Electroencephalogram (EEG), evoked potentials (EP), and electroneuromyography (ENMG)

被引:80
作者
Guerit, J. -M. [1 ]
Amantini, A. [2 ]
Amodio, P. [3 ]
Andersen, K. V. [4 ]
Butler, S. [5 ]
de Weerd, A. [6 ,7 ,8 ]
Facco, E. [3 ]
Fischer, C. [9 ]
Hantson, P. [1 ]
Jantti, V. [10 ]
Lamblin, M. -D. [11 ]
Litscher, G. [12 ]
Pereon, Y. [13 ]
机构
[1] Chirec, Clin Edith Cavell, Neurol, B-1180 Brussels, Belgium
[2] Univ Florence, Dept Neurol Sci, Florence, Italy
[3] Univ Padua, Padua, Italy
[4] Univ Copenhagen, Glostrup Hosp, Dept Clin Neurophysiol, Glostrup, Denmark
[5] Burden Neurol Inst, Bristol BS16 1QT, Avon, England
[6] SEIN, Dept Clin Neurophysiol, Zwolle, Netherlands
[7] SEIN, Sleep Ctr, Zwolle, Netherlands
[8] Univ Padua, Dip SpecialitA Medicochirurg, Sez Clin Odontoiatr, Cattedra Anestesia Gen & Speciale Odontostomatol, I-35128 Padua, Italy
[9] Neurol & Neurosurg Hosp, Lyon, France
[10] Tampere Univ Technol, Dept Clin Neurophysiol, FI-33521 Tampere, Finland
[11] Hop Roger Salengro, Serv Neurophysiol Clin, F-59037 Lille, France
[12] Graz Univ, Dept Anesthesiol & Crit Care, Graz, Austria
[13] Hop Laennec, Serv Neurol, F-44035 Nantes, France
来源
NEUROPHYSIOLOGIE CLINIQUE-CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY | 2009年 / 39卷 / 02期
关键词
Coma; Brain death; Epilepsy; Hepatic encephalopathy; Prognosis; Intensive care unit; Neonates; Electroencephalogram; Evoked potentials; Electromyography; Neuromonitoring; Guidelines; Consensus; Expert opinion; NONCONVULSIVE STATUS EPILEPTICUS; PROGNOSTIC VALUE; PREDICTIVE-VALUE; BRAIN-INJURY; COMA; SEIZURES; MATURATION; PREMATURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.neucli.2009.03.002
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study aim. -To provide a consensus of European leading authorities about the optimal use of clinical neurophysiological (CN) tests (electroencephalogram [EEG]; evoked potentials [EP]; electroneuromyography [ENMG]) in the intensive care unit (ICU) and, particularly, about the way to make these tests clinically useful for the management of individual patients. Methods. -This study gathered together several European clinical neurophysiologists and neurointensivists whose leading contributions in the adult or paediatric ICU and in continuous neuromonitoring had been peer-acknowledged. It was based on both a literature review and each participant's own experience. Given the methodological impossibility to gather studies fulfilling criteria of evidence-based medicine, this article essentially relies on expert opinions that were gained after several rounds, in which each expert was invited to communicate his own contribution to all other experts. A complete consensus has been reached when submitting the manuscript. Results. -What the group considered as the best classification systems for EEG and EP abnormalities in the ICU is first presented. CN tests are useful for diagnosis (epilepsy, brain death, and neuromuscular disorders), prognosis (anoxic ischemic encephalopathy, head trauma, and neurologic disturbances of metabolic and toxic origin), and follow-up, in the adult, paediatric, and neonatal ICU. Regarding prognosis, a clear distinction is made between these tests whose abnormalities are indicative of an ominous prognosis and those whose relative normalcy is indicative of a good prognosis. The prognostic significance of any test may vary as a function of coma etiology. Conclusion. -CN provides quantitative functional assessment of the nervous system. It can be used in sedated or curarized patients. Therefore, it should play a major role in the individual assessment of ICU patients. (C) 2009 Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.
引用
收藏
页码:71 / 83
页数:13
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]   Prediction of 'awakening' and outcome in prolonged acute coma from severe traumatic brain injury: evidence for validity of short latency SEPs [J].
Amantini, A ;
Grippo, A ;
Fossi, S ;
Cesaretti, C ;
Piccioli, A ;
Peris, A ;
Ragazzoni, A ;
Pinto, F .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2005, 116 (01) :229-235
[2]  
AMANTINI A, 2009, NCCN NEUROP IN PRESS
[3]   Are somatosensory evoked potentials the best predictor of outcome after severe brain injury? A systematic review [J].
Carter, BG ;
Butt, W .
INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2005, 31 (06) :765-775
[4]   Review of the use of somatosensory evoked potentials in the prediction of outcome after severe brain injury [J].
Carter, BG ;
Butt, W .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2001, 29 (01) :178-186
[5]   Detection of electrographic seizures with continuous EEG monitoring in critically ill patients [J].
Claassen, J ;
Mayer, SA ;
Kowalski, RG ;
Emerson, RG ;
Hirsch, LJ .
NEUROLOGY, 2004, 62 (10) :1743-1748
[6]   Continuous electroencephalographic monitoring in neurocritical care. [J].
Claassen J. ;
Mayer S.A. .
Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports, 2002, 2 (6) :534-540
[7]  
D'Allest A. M., 1996, Archives de Pediatrie, V3, p254S, DOI 10.1016/0929-693X(96)86059-3
[8]   Predicting coma and other low responsive patients outcome using event-related brain potentials: A meta-analysis [J].
Daltrozzo, J. ;
Wioland, N. ;
Mutschler, V. ;
Kotchoubey, B. .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2007, 118 (03) :606-614
[9]  
De Weerd A W, 1999, Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl, V52, P149
[10]  
DEWEERD AW, 2001, CLIN NEUROPHYSIOL, V53, P243