Factors Affecting Life-Sustaining Treatment Decisions by Health Care Surrogates and Proxies: Assessing Benefits and Barriers

被引:4
作者
Buckey, Julia W. [2 ]
Abell, Neil [1 ]
机构
[1] Florida State Univ, Coll Social Work, Tallahassee, FL 32306 USA
[2] Univ Cent Florida, Sch Social Work, Orlando, FL 32816 USA
关键词
health care surrogate; health care proxy; life-sustaining treatment decisions; health care decision-making; HBM (Health Belief Model); SUBSTITUTED JUDGMENT; END; SUPPORT; WITHDRAWAL; FAMILIES;
D O I
10.1080/00981380802606680
中图分类号
C916 [社会工作、社会管理、社会规划];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
Terri Schiavo's life and death placed international focus on social workers' need to better understand and serve health care surrogates and proxies making life-sustaining treatment decisions on behalf of medical patients. This study (N = 132) reports initial validation of a new measure, the Acceptance of Treatment Choice Inventory (ATCI), designed to evaluate benefits and barriers considered by health care surrogates and proxies prior to making a life-sustaining treatment decision about CPR, tube-feedings, dialysis, and ventilation. Affirming a two-factor model with acceptable reliability and preliminary construct validity, surrogates sought decision support and desired to represent patients' wishes adequately.
引用
收藏
页码:386 / 401
页数:16
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Families looking back: One year after discussion of withdrawal or withholding of life-sustaining support [J].
Abbott, KH ;
Sago, JG ;
Breen, CM ;
Abernethy, AP ;
Tulsky, JA .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2001, 29 (01) :197-201
[2]   After-death interviews with surrogates/bereaved family members: Some issues of validity [J].
Addington-Hall, J ;
McPherson, C .
JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2001, 22 (03) :784-790
[3]   The need to revise assumptions about the end of life:: Implications for social work practice [J].
Bern-Klug, M ;
Gessert, C ;
Forbes, S .
HEALTH & SOCIAL WORK, 2001, 26 (01) :38-48
[4]  
Buckey J. W., 2007, DISS ABSTR INT A, V68, P2169
[5]   Validation of the health care surrogate preferences scale [J].
Buckey, JW ;
Abell, N .
SOCIAL WORK, 2004, 49 (03) :432-440
[6]  
Christ GH, 1999, SOC WORK HEALTH CARE, V30, P81
[8]   Communication and decision-making in seriously ill patients: Findings of the SUPPORT project [J].
Covinsky, KE ;
Fuller, JD ;
Yaffe, K ;
Johnston, CB ;
Hamel, MB ;
Lynn, J ;
Teno, JM ;
Phillips, RS .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2000, 48 (05) :S187-S193
[9]   Translating psychosocial insight into ethical discussions supportive of families in end-of-life decision-making [J].
Foster, LW ;
McLellan, LJ .
SOCIAL WORK IN HEALTH CARE, 2002, 35 (03) :37-51
[10]  
George Linda K, 2002, Gerontologist, V42 Spec No 3, P86