Anesthesia Provider Model, Hospital Resources, and Maternal Outcomes

被引:32
作者
Needleman, Jack [2 ]
Minnick, Ann F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Sch Nursing, Nashville, TN 37240 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Serv, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
关键词
Anesthesia; maternal outcomes; quality of health care; clinical competence; RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS; PROPENSITY SCORE; PATIENT OUTCOMES; UNITED-STATES; DELIVERY; MORBIDITY;
D O I
10.1111/j.1475-6773.2008.00919.x
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
100404 [儿少卫生与妇幼保健学];
摘要
Determine the ability of anesthesia provider model and hospital resources to explain maternal outcome variation. 1,141,641 obstetrical patients from 369 hospitals that reported at least one live birth in 2002 in six representative states. Logistic regression of death, anesthesia complication, nonanesthesia maternal complication, and obstetrical trauma for all patients and those having cesarean deliveries on anesthesia provider model, obstetrical and anesthesia, and patient variables. Data was assembled from information given by hospitals to state agencies and from a 2004 survey of obstetrical organization resources. Anesthesia complication rates in anesthesiologist-only hospitals were 0.27 percent compared with 0.23 percent in certified registered nurse anesthetist (CRNA) only hospitals. Rates among other provider models varied from 0.24 to 0.37 percent with none statistically different from the anesthesiologist-only hospitals. A similar pattern was observed for rates of other outcomes. Multivariate analysis found no systematic differences between hospitals with anesthesiologist-only models and models using CRNAs. There was no consistent pattern of association of other hospital or patient characteristics with outcomes. Hospitals that use only CRNAs, or a combination of CRNAs and anesthesiologists, do not have systematically poorer maternal outcomes compared with hospitals using anesthesiologist-only models.
引用
收藏
页码:464 / 482
页数:19
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]
Anesthesia providers, patient outcomes, and costs [J].
Abenstein, JP ;
Warner, MA .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1996, 82 (06) :1273-1283
[2]
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2003, GUID PAT SAF IND
[3]
[Anonymous], HLTH US 2005 CHARTB
[4]
Estimation of average treatment effects based on propensity scores [J].
Becker, Sascha O. ;
Ichino, Andrea .
STATA JOURNAL, 2002, 2 (04) :358-377
[5]
A NEW METHOD OF CLASSIFYING PROGNOSTIC CO-MORBIDITY IN LONGITUDINAL-STUDIES - DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION [J].
CHARLSON, ME ;
POMPEI, P ;
ALES, KL ;
MACKENZIE, CR .
JOURNAL OF CHRONIC DISEASES, 1987, 40 (05) :373-383
[6]
D'Agostino RB, 1998, STAT MED, V17, P2265, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19981015)17:19<2265::AID-SIM918>3.0.CO
[7]
2-B
[8]
Magnitude of maternal morbidity during labor and delivery: United States, 1993-1997 [J].
Danel, I ;
Berg, C ;
Johnson, CH ;
Atrash, H .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2003, 93 (04) :631-634
[9]
Perioperative risk - How can we study the influence of provider characteristics? [J].
Fleisher, LA ;
Anderson, GF .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2002, 96 (05) :1039-1041
[10]
An American tale - professional conflicts in anaesthesia in the United States: implications for the United Kingdom [J].
Kane, M ;
Smith, AF .
ANAESTHESIA, 2004, 59 (08) :793-802