Clinical sensitivity of prenatal screening for cystic fibrosis via CFTR carrier testing in a United States panethnic population

被引:73
作者
Palomaki, GE
FitzSimmons, SC
Haddow, JE
机构
[1] Fdn Blood Res, Scarborough, ME 04074 USA
[2] FitzSimmons & Associates, Epidemiol & Clin Res, Bethesda, MD USA
关键词
cystic fibrosis; CFTR; prenatal screening; clinical sensitivity; ethnicity;
D O I
10.1097/01.GIM.0000139505.06194.39
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Purpose: To estimate CFTR mutation frequencies, clinical sensitivities (proportions of carrier couples or affected fetuses detected), and birth prevalence estimates for broad racial/ethnic groups and for a panethnic U.S. population. Methods: Published sources of information were identified, corrected when appropriate, and summarized. Combining racial/ethnic-specific mutation frequencies and birth prevalence estimates allowed the computation of panethnic estimates. Results: Two of the 25 recommended mutations do not meet the 0.1% threshold in a panethnic population set by the American College of Medical Genetics. The clinical sensitivities are estimated to be 71.9%, 51.7%, 41.6%, 88.6%, and 23.4% for non-Hispanic Caucasians, Hispanic Caucasian, African American, Ashkenazi Jewish Caucasian, and Asian American couples, respectively. Birth prevalence estimates are 1:2,500, 1:13,500, 1:15,100, 1:2,270, and 1:35,100, whereas the number of couples needed to screen to detect an affected fetus are about 3,200, 26,120; 36,040; 2,600, and 129,600, respectively, for the same racial/ethnic groups. Conclusions: Overall, the panethnic estimates for CFTR mutation frequencies are similar to those for non-Hispanic Caucasians. However, large differences in both clinical sensitivity and birth prevalence exist between the broad racial/ethnic groups examined. Whether and how the differences in the numbers of couples needed to screen to detect an affected fetus are to be included in prenatal screening for cystic fibrosis needs to be more explicitly addressed.
引用
收藏
页码:405 / 414
页数:10
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
ABELIOVICH D, 1992, AM J HUM GENET, V51, P951
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2001, PREC PREN CARR SCREE
[3]   Cystic fibrosis population carrier screening: Here at last-Are we ready? [J].
Grody, WW ;
Desnick, RJ .
GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2001, 3 (02) :87-90
[4]   Comparison of the clinical manifestations of cystic fibrosis in black and white patients [J].
Hamosh, A ;
FitzSimmons, SC ;
Macek, M ;
Knowles, MR ;
Rosenstein, BJ ;
Cutting, GR .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 1998, 132 (02) :255-259
[5]   Improved detection of cystic fibrosis mutations in the heterogeneous US population using an expanded, pan-ethnic mutation panel [J].
Heim, RA ;
Sugarman, EA ;
Allitto, BA .
GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2001, 3 (03) :168-176
[6]  
KAZAZIAN HH, 1994, HUM MUTAT, V4, P167
[7]   Cystic fibrosis in Jews: Frequency and mutation distribution [J].
Kerem, B ;
Chiba-Falek, O ;
Kerem, E .
GENETIC TESTING, 1997, 1 (01) :35-39
[8]   HIGHLY VARIABLE INCIDENCE OF CYSTIC-FIBROSIS AND DIFFERENT MUTATION DISTRIBUTION AMONG DIFFERENT JEWISH ETHNIC-GROUPS IN ISRAEL [J].
KEREM, E ;
KALMAN, YM ;
YAHAV, Y ;
SHOSHANI, T ;
ABELIOVICH, D ;
SZEINBERG, A ;
RIVLIN, J ;
BLAU, H ;
TAL, A ;
BENTUR, L ;
SPRINGER, C ;
AUGARTEN, A ;
GODFREY, S ;
LERER, I ;
BRANSKI, D ;
FRIEDMAN, M ;
KEREM, B .
HUMAN GENETICS, 1995, 96 (02) :193-197
[9]  
Macek M, 1997, AM J HUM GENET, V60, P1122
[10]  
Macek M, 1997, HUM MUTAT, V9, P136, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1098-1004(1997)9:2<136::AID-HUMU6>3.0.CO