Reliability of gait speed measured by a timed walking test in patients one year after stroke

被引:116
作者
Green, J
Forster, A
Young, J
机构
[1] Bradford Community NHS Trust, Bradford, W Yorkshire, England
[2] Bradford Hosp NHS Trust, Dept Hlth Care Elderly, Bradford, W Yorkshire, England
关键词
D O I
10.1191/0269215502cr495oa
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objective: To assess the reliability of gait speed in late-stage stroke patients. Design: Test-retest reliability of three timed walks to 10 metres repeated during two assessments one week apart. Setting: The patient's home. Subjects: Twenty-two stroke patients with mobility problems more than one year after stroke. Main outcome measure: Gait speed measured in seconds taken to walk 10 metres. Statistical analysis: Intraclass correlations (ICCs) with 95% confidence interval (Cl) and the Bland and Altman method for assessing agreement by calculating the mean difference between measurements ((d) over bar), the 95% CI for (d) over bar; the standard deviation of the difference (SDdiff); a reliability coefficient and the 95% limits of agreement. Results: There was a trend for decreased times taken to walk 10 metres both within each assessment and between assessments. ICCs for within-assessment reliability were 0.95-0.99. The (d) over bar (SDdiff) for the second and third walks for assessment 1 was -1.00 (2.63) seconds and for assessment 2 was -0.70 (1.58) seconds. The reliability coefficient was 5.26 for assessment 1 and 3.17 for assessment 2. ICCs for between-assessment reliability were 0.87-0.88. The (d) over bar (SDdiff) for the comparison of the third walks at assessment 1 and assessment 2 was -0.90 (5.01) seconds. The reliability coefficient was 10.02 and the 95% limits of agreement were -10.92 to +9.12 seconds. Conclusion: Within-assessment gait speed measured at home is highly reliable. The between-assessment reliability of gait speed measurement is less reliable but comparable with other studies.
引用
收藏
页码:306 / 314
页数:9
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Statistical methods for assessing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sports medicine [J].
Atkinson, G ;
Nevill, AM .
SPORTS MEDICINE, 1998, 26 (04) :217-238
[2]   Shared responsibility for ongoing rehabilitation: a new approach to home-based therapy after stroke [J].
Baskett, JJ ;
Broad, JB ;
Reekie, G ;
Hocking, C ;
Green, G .
CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 1999, 13 (01) :23-33
[3]  
Bernhardt J, 1998, Physiother Res Int, V3, P109, DOI 10.1002/pri.130
[4]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[5]   Statistics notes: Measurement error proportional to the mean .23. [J].
Bland, JM ;
Altman, DG .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1996, 313 (7049) :106-106
[6]  
BOHANNON RW, 1990, ARCH PHYS MED REHAB, V71, P330
[7]  
BRANDSTATER ME, 1983, ARCH PHYS MED REHAB, V64, P583
[8]   STATISTICAL-METHODS FOR ASSESSING OBSERVER VARIABILITY IN CLINICAL MEASURES [J].
BRENNAN, P ;
SILMAN, A .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1992, 304 (6840) :1491-1494
[9]  
Collen F M, 1991, Int Disabil Stud, V13, P12
[10]  
Collen F M, 1990, Int Disabil Stud, V12, P6