Differences between first and subsequent rounds of the MRISC breast cancer screening program for women with a familial or genetic predisposition

被引:67
作者
Kriege, Mieke
Brekelmans, Cecile T. M.
Boetes, Carla
Muller, Sara H.
Zonderland, Harmine M.
Obdeijn, Inge Marie
Manoliu, Radu A.
Kok, Theo
Rutgers, Emiel J. T.
de Koning, Harry J.
Klijn, Jan G. M.
机构
[1] Erasmus MC Daniel Den Hoed Canc Ctr, Dept Med Oncol, Rotterdam Family Canc Clin, NL-3075 EA Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[3] Netherlands Canc Inst, Dept Radiol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Leiden, Netherlands
[5] Erasmus MC Daniel den Hoed Canc Ctr, Dept Radiol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[6] VU Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[7] Univ Groningen, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Groningen, Netherlands
[8] Netherlands Canc Inst, Dept Surg, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[9] Erasmus MC, Dept Publ Hlth, Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
BRCA1/2; breast cancer screening; high risk; mammography; magnetic resonance imaging; screening rounds;
D O I
10.1002/cncr.21863
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND. within the Dutch MRI Screening (MRISC) study, a Dutch multicenter screening study for hereditary breast cancer, the authors investigated whether previously reported increased diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) compared with mammography would be maintained during subsequent screening rounds. METHODS. From November 1999 to October 2003,1909 eligible women were included in the study. Screening parameters and tumor characteristics of different rounds were calculated and compared. The authors defined 3 different types of imaging screening rounds: first round in women never screened by imaging before, first round in women screened by imaging (mainly mammography) before, and subsequent rounds. RESULTS. The difference in sensitivity for invasive cancers between mammography and MRI was largest in the first round of women previously screened with mammography (20.0 vs. 93.3%; P =.003), but also in subsequent rounds, there was a significant difference in favor of MRI (29.4 vs. 76.5%; P =.02). The difference in false-positive rate between mammography and MRI was also largest in the first round of women previously screened with mammography (5.5 vs. 14.0%; P <.001), and it remained significant in subsequent rounds (4.6 vs. 8.2%; P <.001). Screen-detected tumors were smaller and more often lymph node negative than symptomatic tumors in age-matched control patients, but no major differences in tumor stage were found between tumors detected at subsequent rounds compared with those in the first round. CONCLUSIONS. in subsequent rounds, a significantly higher sensitivity and better discriminating capacity of MRI compared with mammography was maintained, and a favorable tumor stage compared with age-matched symptomatic controls. As results of these subsequent screening rounds were most predictive for long-term effects, the authors expect that this screening program will contribute to a decrease of breast cancer mortality in these high-risk women.
引用
收藏
页码:2318 / 2326
页数:9
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] ANDERSON TJ, 1986, LANCET, V1, P519
  • [2] [Anonymous], BREAST IM REP DAT SY
  • [3] Stage distribution at first and repeat examinations in breast cancer screening
    Boer, R
    de Koning, H
    van Oortmarssen, G
    Warmerdam, P
    van der Maas, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 1999, 6 (03) : 132 - 138
  • [4] Effectiveness of breast cancer surveillance in BRCA1/2 gene mutation carriers and women with high familial risk
    Brekelmans, CTM
    Seynaeve, C
    Bartels, CCM
    Tilanus-Linthorst, MMA
    Meijers-Heijboer, EJ
    Crepin, CMG
    van Geel, AN
    Menke, M
    Verhoog, LC
    van den Ouweland, A
    Obdeijn, IM
    Klijn, JGM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2001, 19 (04) : 924 - 930
  • [5] Differential value of comparison with previous examinations in diagnostic versus screening mammography
    Burnside, ES
    Sickles, EA
    Sohlich, RE
    Dee, KE
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2002, 179 (05) : 1173 - 1177
  • [6] CLAUS EB, 1994, CANCER, V73, P643, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19940201)73:3<643::AID-CNCR2820730323>3.0.CO
  • [7] 2-5
  • [8] COLE P, 1980, JNCI-J NATL CANCER I, V64, P1263
  • [9] BREAST-CANCER SCREENING PROGRAMS - THE DEVELOPMENT OF A MONITORING AND EVALUATION SYSTEM
    DAY, NE
    WILLIAMS, DRR
    KHAW, KT
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1989, 59 (06) : 954 - 958
  • [10] NATIONWIDE BREAST-CANCER SCREENING IN THE NETHERLANDS - SUPPORT FOR BREAST-CANCER MORTALITY REDUCTION
    DEKONING, HJ
    FRACHEBOUD, J
    BOER, R
    VERBEEK, ALM
    COLLETTE, HJA
    HENDRIKS, JHCL
    VANINEVELD, BM
    DEBRUYN, AE
    Van Der Maas, PJ
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1995, 60 (06) : 777 - 780