High-pressure co-gasification of coal with biomass and petroleum coke

被引:165
作者
Fermoso, J. [1 ]
Arias, B. [1 ]
Plaza, M. G. [1 ]
Pevida, C. [1 ]
Rubiera, F. [1 ]
Pis, J. J. [1 ]
Garcia-Pena, F. [2 ]
Casero, P. [2 ]
机构
[1] CSIC, Inst Nacl Carbon, E-33080 Oviedo, Spain
[2] Elcogas SA CT GICC Puertollano, Ciudad Real, Spain
关键词
Hydrogen; Co-gasification; High pressure; Coal; Biomass; SPOUT-FLUID BED; HYDROGEN-PRODUCTION SYSTEMS; STEAM GASIFICATION; PART; ELECTRICITY; CONVERSION; CAPTURE; REACTOR; STORAGE; WASTES;
D O I
10.1016/j.fuproc.2009.02.006
中图分类号
O69 [应用化学];
学科分类号
070301 [无机化学];
摘要
The effects of the main operation variables (temperature, pressure and gasifying agent composition) on gas production and other process parameters, such as carbon conversion, cold gas efficiency and high heating value, during the steam-oxygen gasification of a bituminous coal were studied. It was observed that temperature and oxygen concentration were the most influential variables during the gasification process. In addition, co-gasification tests of binary blends of a bituminous coal with different types of biomass (up to 10%) and petroleum coke (up to 60%), as well as ternary blends of coal-petcoke-biomass (45-45-10%) were conducted in order to study the effect of blending on gas production and carbon conversion. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:926 / 932
页数:7
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]
Fluidised bed co-gasification of coal and olive oil industry wastes [J].
André, RN ;
Pinto, F ;
Franco, C ;
Dias, M ;
Gulyurtlu, I ;
Matos, MAA ;
Cabrita, I .
FUEL, 2005, 84 (12-13) :1635-1644
[2]
BASSI L, 1997, FLOWERS, P429
[3]
Catalytic effects observed during the co-gasification of coal and switchgrass [J].
Brown, RC ;
Liu, Q ;
Norton, G .
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2000, 18 (06) :499-506
[4]
CASERO P, 2007, INT FREIB C IGCC XTL
[5]
Co-gasification of biomass and coal for methanol synthesis [J].
Chmielniak, T ;
Sciazko, M .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2003, 74 (3-4) :393-403
[6]
A comparison of electricity and hydrogen production systems with CO2 capture and storage.: Part A:: Review and selection of promising conversion and capture technologies [J].
Damen, K ;
van Troost, M ;
Faaij, A ;
Turkenburg, W .
PROGRESS IN ENERGY AND COMBUSTION SCIENCE, 2006, 32 (02) :215-246
[7]
A comparison of electricity and hydrogen production systems with CO2 capture and storage -: Part B:: Chain analysis of promising CCS options [J].
Damen, Kay ;
van Troost, Martijn ;
Faaij, Andre ;
Turkenburg, Wim .
PROGRESS IN ENERGY AND COMBUSTION SCIENCE, 2007, 33 (06) :580-609
[8]
Hydrogen futures: toward a sustainable energy system [J].
Dunn, S .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2002, 27 (03) :235-264
[9]
Kinetic models comparison for steam gasification of different nature fuel chars [J].
Fermoso, J. ;
Arias, B. ;
Pevida, C. ;
Plaza, M. G. ;
Rubiera, F. ;
Pis, J. J. .
JOURNAL OF THERMAL ANALYSIS AND CALORIMETRY, 2008, 91 (03) :779-786
[10]
FERMOSO J, 2007, P INT C COAL SCI TEC