Does the cognitive reflection test measure cognitive reflection? A mathematical modeling approach

被引:176
作者
Campitelli, Guillermo [1 ]
Gerrans, Paul [2 ]
机构
[1] Edith Cowan Univ, Sch Psychol & Social Sci, Joondalup, WA 6027, Australia
[2] Univ Western Australia, UWA Business Sch, Perth, WA 6009, Australia
关键词
Cognitive reflection test; Actively open-minded thinking; Rational thinking; Thinking dispositions; Mathematical ability; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; DECISION-MAKING; BELIEF-BIAS; THINKING; NUMERACY; PERFORMANCE; HEURISTICS; ABILITY;
D O I
10.3758/s13421-013-0367-9
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
We used a mathematical modeling approach, based on a sample of 2,019 participants, to better understand what the cognitive reflection test (CRT; Frederick In Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19, 25-42, 2005) measures. This test, which is typically completed in less than 10 min, contains three problems and aims to measure the ability or disposition to resist reporting the response that first comes to mind. However, since the test contains three mathematically based problems, it is possible that the test only measures mathematical abilities, and not cognitive reflection. We found that the models that included an inhibition parameter (i.e., the probability of inhibiting an intuitive response), as well as a mathematical parameter (i.e., the probability of using an adequate mathematical procedure), fitted the data better than a model that only included a mathematical parameter. We also found that the inhibition parameter in males is best explained by both rational thinking ability and the disposition toward actively open-minded thinking, whereas in females this parameter was better explained by rational thinking only. With these findings, this study contributes to the understanding of the processes involved in solving the CRT, and will be particularly useful for researchers who are considering using this test in their research.
引用
收藏
页码:434 / 447
页数:14
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2008, COGNITION
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2012, R LANG ENV STAT COMP
[3]  
Baron J., 1985, Rationality and intelligence
[4]   THE COGNITIVE-MISER RESPONSE MODEL: TESTING FOR INTUITIVE AND DELIBERATE REASONING [J].
Boeckenholt, Ulf .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 2012, 77 (02) :388-399
[5]  
Campitelli G, 2010, JUDGM DECIS MAK, V5, P182
[6]  
Cokely ET, 2009, JUDGM DECIS MAK, V4, P20
[7]  
Costa P.T., 1992, PSYCHOL ASSESSMENT R, V396, P653
[8]   CONSTRUCTIVE THINKING - A BROAD COPING VARIABLE WITH SPECIFIC COMPONENTS [J].
EPSTEIN, S ;
MEIER, P .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1989, 57 (02) :332-350
[9]   Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition [J].
Evans, Jonathan St. B. T. .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 59 :255-278
[10]   ON THE CONFLICT BETWEEN LOGIC AND BELIEF IN SYLLOGISTIC REASONING [J].
EVANS, JST ;
BARSTON, JL ;
POLLARD, P .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 1983, 11 (03) :295-306