Does integration and economic policy coordination promote business cycle synchronization in the EU?

被引:33
作者
Antonakakis, N. [1 ,2 ]
Tondl, G. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Vienna Univ Econ & Business, Inst Int Econ, Dept Econ, A-1020 Vienna, Austria
[2] Univ Portsmouth, Econ & Finance Subject Grp, Portsmouth PO1 3DE, Hants, England
[3] Vienna Univ Econ & Business, Res Inst European Affairs, A-1020 Vienna, Austria
关键词
Business cycle; Synchronization; Transmission; Direct and indirect effect; FDI; Trade; Monetary union; EU; TRADE; AREA; SPECIALIZATION; GLOBALIZATION; TRANSMISSION; CONVERGENCE; ENDOGENEITY;
D O I
10.1007/s10663-014-9254-2
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Previous studies have discounted important factors and indirect channels that might contribute to business cycle synchronization (BCS) in the EU. We estimate the effects of market integration and economic policy coordination on bilateral business cycle correlations over the period 1995-2012 using a simultaneous equations model that takes into accounts both the endogenous relationships and unveils direct and indirect effects. The results suggest that (1) trade and FDI have a pronounced positive effect on BCS, particularly between incumbent and new EU members. (2) Rising specialization does not decouple business cycles. (3) The decline of income disparities in EU27 contributes to BCS, as converging countries develop stronger trade and FDI linkages. (4) There is strong evidence that poor fiscal discipline of EU members is a major impediment of business cycle synchronization. (5) The same argument holds true for exchange rate fluctuations that hinder BCS, particularly in EU15. Since BCS is a fundamental prerequisite and objective in an effective monetary union, the EU has to promote market integration and strengthen the common setting of economic policies.
引用
收藏
页码:541 / 575
页数:35
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
Akin C., 2011, TECHNICAL REPORT, DOI [10.2139/ssrn.1022648, DOI 10.2139/SSRN.1022648]
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1969, Essays in International Economics, DOI DOI 10.2307/J.CTVBCD28K.14
[3]  
Artis MJ, 1997, INT J FINANC ECON, V2, P1, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1158(199701)2:1<1::AID-IJFE31>3.0.CO
[4]  
2-7
[5]   The transmission of business cycles - Implications for EMU enlargement [J].
Artis, Michael J. ;
Fidrmuc, Jarko ;
Scharler, Johann .
ECONOMICS OF TRANSITION, 2008, 16 (03) :559-582
[6]   INTERNATIONAL REAL BUSINESS CYCLES [J].
BACKUS, DK ;
KEHOE, PJ ;
KYDLAND, FE .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1992, 100 (04) :745-775
[7]   What has determined the rapid post-war growth of intra-EU trade? [J].
Badinger, H ;
Breuss, F .
REVIEW OF WORLD ECONOMICS, 2004, 140 (01) :31-51
[8]   Codependence and convergence in the EC economies [J].
Beine, M ;
Hecq, A .
JOURNAL OF POLICY MODELING, 1998, 20 (04) :403-426
[9]  
Calderon C, 2003, WORKING PAPERS CENTR, V213
[10]   Are European business cycles close enough to be just one? [J].
Camacho, Maximo ;
Perez-Quiros, Gabriel ;
Saiz, Lorena .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC DYNAMICS & CONTROL, 2006, 30 (9-10) :1687-1706