Fmr1 knockout mice are impaired in a leverpress escape/avoidance task

被引:55
作者
Brennan, F. X.
Albeck, D. S.
Paylor, R.
机构
[1] VA Med Ctr, Med Res, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Dept Psychiat, Sch Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[3] Univ Colorado, Dept Psychol, Denver, CO 80309 USA
[4] Baylor Coll Med, Dept Mol & Human Genet, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[5] Baylor Coll Med, Dept Neurosci, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
aversive conditioning; escape/avoidance; fragile X syndrome;
D O I
10.1111/j.1601-183X.2005.00183.x
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Fragile X syndrome (FXS) is the most common form of inherited mental retardation (MR). FXS is typically caused by a mutation of the Fmr1 gene (Verkerk et al. 1991, Cell 65, 905-914). To better understand the role of Fmr1 and its gene product fragile X mental-retardation protein (FMRP) in central nervous system function, researchers have turned to the use of animal model systems to generate an Fmr1 knockout (KO) mouse that is deficient in FMRP (Bakker et al. 1994, Cell 78, 23-33). Unfortunately, a number of studies have found no consistent, robust learning and memory impairment in the Fmr1 KO mice. We conducted a study to assess the performance of Fmr1 KO and wildtype (WT) animals in a leverpress escape/avoidance paradigm. Fmr1 KO and WT littermates were studied in four daily 1-h sessions. The Fmr1 KO mice performed fewer avoidance and total responses than WT mice. The KO animals were not simply deficient in avoidance, but a within-factor ANOVA revealed that they did not acquire the leverpress response to any appreciable degree. Observation during the sessions indicated that the Fmr1 KO animals clearly responded to the shock, eliminating an obvious sensory explanation for the deficit. The fact that other studies have found that the KO mice displayed increased exploratory and locomotor activity compared with WT controls argues against a motoric deficit. Future studies will attempt to delineate the nature of the behavioral deficit as well as attempt to rescue the response with glutamatergic or dopaminergic agents.
引用
收藏
页码:467 / 471
页数:5
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
BAKKER CE, 1994, CELL, V78, P23
[2]   CONTRASTING LEVER-PRESS AVOIDANCE BEHAVIORS OF SPONTANEOUSLY HYPERTENSIVE AND NORMOTENSIVE RATS (RATTUS-NORVEGICUS) [J].
BERGER, DF ;
STARZEC, JJ .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 1988, 102 (03) :279-286
[3]   RAPID ACQUISITION OF DISCRETE-TRIAL LEVER-PRESS AVOIDANCE - EFFECTS OF SIGNAL-SHOCK INTERVAL [J].
BERGER, DF ;
BRUSH, FR .
JOURNAL OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR, 1975, 24 (02) :227-239
[4]   Genetic differences in leverpress escape/avoidance conditioning in seven mouse strains [J].
Brennan, FX .
GENES BRAIN AND BEHAVIOR, 2004, 3 (02) :110-114
[5]  
BROWN WT, 1997, 8 INT WORKSH FRAG 10
[6]  
BRUSH FR, 1966, J COMP PHYSIOL PSYCH, V55, P888
[7]   Mildly impaired water maze performance in male Fmr1 knockout mice [J].
DHooge, R ;
Nagels, G ;
Franck, F ;
Bakker, CE ;
Reyniers, E ;
Storm, K ;
Kooy, RF ;
Oostra, BA ;
Willems, PJ ;
DeDeyn, PP .
NEUROSCIENCE, 1997, 76 (02) :367-376
[8]   Fmr1 knockout mouse has a distinctive strain-specific learning impairment [J].
Dobkin, C ;
Rabe, A ;
Dumas, R ;
El Idrissi, A ;
Haubenstock, H ;
Brown, WT .
NEUROSCIENCE, 2000, 100 (02) :423-429
[9]  
Fisch GS, 1999, AM J MED GENET, V84, P277, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8628(19990528)84:3<277::AID-AJMG22>3.0.CO
[10]  
2-W