A comparison of two spectral approaches for computing the Earth response to surface loads

被引:11
作者
Le Meur, E [1 ]
Hindmarsh, RCA [1 ]
机构
[1] British Antarctic Survey, NERC, Cambridge CB3 0ET, England
关键词
deformation; earth models; load Love numbers; surface loads;
D O I
10.1046/j.1365-246x.2000.00068.x
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
When predicting the deformation of the Earth under surface loads, most models follow the same methodology, consisting of producing a unit response that is then con-volved with the appropriate surface forcing. These models take into account the whole Earth, and are generally spherical, computing a unit response in terms of its spherical harmonic representation through the use of load Love numbers. From these Love numbers, the spatial pattern of the bedrock response to any particular scenario can be obtained. Two different methods are discussed here. The first, which is related to the convolution in the classical sense, appears to be very sensitive to the total number of degrees used when summing these Love numbers in the harmonic series in order to obtain the corresponding Green's function. We will see from the spectral properties of these Love numbers how to compute these series correctly and how consequently to eliminate in practice the sensitivity to the number of degrees (Gibbs Phenomena). The second method relies on a preliminary harmonic decomposition of the load, which reduces the convolution to a simple product within Fourier space. The convergence properties of the resulting Fourier series make this approach less sensitive to any harmonic cut-off. However, this method can be more or less computationally expensive depending on the loading characteristics. This paper describes these two methods, how to eliminate Gibbs phenomena in the Green's function method, and shows how the load characteristics as well as the available computational resources can be determining factors in selecting one approach.
引用
收藏
页码:282 / 298
页数:17
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
ANDERSON BG, 1981, LAST GREAT ICE SHEET
[3]  
Cathles L.M., 1975, VISCOSITY EARTHS MAN
[4]  
CHINNERY MA, 1975, GEOPHYS J ROY ASTR S, V42, P461, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-246X.1975.tb05872.x
[5]   PASSIVE INFLUENCE OF OCEANS UPON ROTATION OF EARTH [J].
DAHLEN, FA .
GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 1976, 46 (02) :363-406
[6]   DEFORMATION OF EARTH BY SURFACE LOADS [J].
FARRELL, WE .
REVIEWS OF GEOPHYSICS AND SPACE PHYSICS, 1972, 10 (03) :761-&
[7]   POSTGLACIAL SEA-LEVEL [J].
FARRELL, WE ;
CLARK, JA .
GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 1976, 46 (03) :647-667
[8]   New inferences of mantle viscosity from joint inversion of long-wavelength mantle convection and post-glacial rebound data [J].
Forte, AM ;
Mitrovica, JX .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 1996, 23 (10) :1147-1150
[9]   ON LATERAL VISCOSITY CONTRAST IN THE MANTLE AND THE RHEOLOGY OF LOW-FREQUENCY GEODYNAMICS [J].
IVINS, ER ;
SAMMIS, CG .
GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 1995, 123 (02) :305-322
[10]   DEEP MANTLE VISCOUS STRUCTURE WITH PRIOR ESTIMATE AND SATELLITE CONSTRAINT [J].
IVINS, ER ;
SAMMIS, CG ;
YODER, CF .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH, 1993, 98 (B3) :4579-4609