The moral nature of patient-centeredness: Is it "just the right thing to do"?

被引:91
作者
Duggan, Patrick S.
Geller, Gail
Cooper, Lisa A.
Beach, Mary Catherine [1 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Welch Ctr Prevent Epidemiol & Clin Res, Baltimore, MD USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Phoebe R Berman Bioeth Inst, Baltimore, MD USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pediat, Baltimore, MD USA
[4] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Div Gen Internal Med, Baltimore, MD USA
[5] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, Baltimore, MD USA
基金
美国医疗保健研究与质量局;
关键词
patient-centeredness; ethics; shared decision-making; physician-patient interaction;
D O I
10.1016/j.pec.2005.08.001
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective: Patient-centeredness is regarded as an important feature of high quality patient care, but little effort has been devoted to grounding patient-centeredness as an explicitly moral concept. We sought to describe the moral commitments that underlie patient-centered care. Methods: We analyzed the key ideas that are commonly described in the literature on patient-centeredness in the context of three major schools of ethical thought. Results: Consequentialist moral theories focus on the positive outcomes of providing patient-centered care. Deontological theories emphasize how patient-centered care reflects the ethical norms inherent in medicine, such as respect for persons and shared decision-making. Virtue-based theories highlight the importance of developing patient-centered attitudes and traits, which in turn influence physicians' behaviors toward their patients. Conclusion: Different ethical theories concentrate on different features of patient-centered care, but all can agree that patient-centeredness is morally valuable. Practice implications: In order to sustain patient-centeredness as a moral concept, practitioners and students ought to examine these ideas to determine what their own personal reasons are for or against adopting a patient-centered approach. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:271 / 276
页数:6
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
*ACCR COUNC GRAD M, 2001, ACGME OUTC PROJ
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1993, WHAT ARE FRIENDS FOR
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1970, PATIENT PERSON EXPLO
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2001, DECL PROF RESP MED S
[5]  
ARISTOTLE, 1952, NICOMACHEAN ETHICS
[6]  
Balint E, 1969, J R Coll Gen Pract, V17, P269
[7]  
Beauchamp TL, 1989, The Principles of biomedical ethics, V3rd
[8]  
BERTAKIS KD, 1991, J FAM PRACTICE, V32, P175
[9]  
Brody H, 1999, J FAM PRACTICE, V48, P585
[10]  
Byrne P. S., 1976, DOCTORS TALKING PATI