Patient versus clinician symptom reporting using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events: results of a questionnaire-based study

被引:558
作者
Basch, Ethan
Iasonos, Alexia
McDonough, Tiffani
Barz, Allison
Culkin, Ann
Kris, Mark G.
Scher, Howard I.
Schrag, Deborah
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, New York, NY 10021 USA
[2] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Med, New York, NY 10021 USA
[3] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Nursing, New York, NY 10021 USA
[4] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Genitourinary Oncol Serv, New York, NY 10021 USA
[5] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Thorac Oncol Serv, New York, NY 10021 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S1470-2045(06)70910-X
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 [肿瘤学];
摘要
Background The Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) are used as standard practice in trials of cancer treatments by clinicians to elicit and report toxic effects. Alternatively, patients could report this information directly as patient-reported outcomes, but the accuracy of these reports compared with clinician reports remains unclear. We aimed to compare the reporting of symptom severity reported by patients and clinicians. Methods Between March and May, 2005, a questionnaire with 11 common CTCAE symptoms was given to consecutive outpatients and their clinicians (physicians and nurses) in lung and genitourinary cancer clinics in the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, N-Y, USA. Patients completed a version that used language adapted from the CTCAE for patient self-reporting. The results from the questionnaire were compared with clinician reporting of the same symptoms. Findings Of 435 patients and their clinicians asked to take part in the study, 400 paired surveys were completed. For most symptoms, agreement between patient and clinician was high, and most discrepancies were within a grade difference of one point. Agreement was higher for symptoms that could be observable directly, such as vomiting and diarrhoea, than for more subjective symptoms, such as fatigue and dyspnoea. Differences in symptom reporting rarely would have changed treatment decisions or dosing, and patients assigned greater severity to symptoms more than did clinicians. No significant differences were recorded between the results when the questionnaire was completed by the patient before or after the clinician. Interpretation Patient reporting of symptoms could add to the current approach to symptom monitoring in cancer treatment trials. Future research should assess the effect of self reporting on clinical outcomes and efficiency, and the use of real-time collection of patient-reported outcomes for early detection of potentially serious adverse events.
引用
收藏
页码:903 / 909
页数:7
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]
Incorporating the patient's perspective into drug development and communication: An ad hoc task force report of the patient-reported outcomes (PRO) harmonization group meeting at the Food and Drug Administration, February 16, 2001 [J].
Acquadro, C ;
Berzon, R ;
Dubois, D ;
Leidy, NK ;
Marquis, P ;
Revicki, D ;
Rothman, M .
VALUE IN HEALTH, 2003, 6 (05) :522-531
[2]
Patient online self-reporting of toxicity symptoms during chemotherapy [J].
Basch, E ;
Artz, D ;
Dulko, D ;
Scher, K ;
Sabbatini, P ;
Hensley, M ;
Mitra, N ;
Speakman, J ;
McCabe, M ;
Schrag, D .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (15) :3552-3561
[3]
Use of information resources by patients with cancer and their companions [J].
Basch, EM ;
Thaler, HT ;
Shi, W ;
Yakren, S ;
Schrag, D .
CANCER, 2004, 100 (11) :2476-2483
[4]
Brief communication: Better ways to question patients about adverse medical events - A randomized, controlled trial [J].
Bent, S ;
Padula, A ;
Avins, AL .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2006, 144 (04) :257-261
[5]
Normal tissue effects:: Reporting and analysis [J].
Bentzen, SM ;
Dörr, W ;
Anscher, MS ;
Denham, JW ;
Hauer-Jensen, M ;
Marks, LB ;
Williams, A .
SEMINARS IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2003, 13 (03) :189-202
[6]
BIAS, PREVALENCE AND KAPPA [J].
BYRT, T ;
BISHOP, J ;
CARLIN, JB .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1993, 46 (05) :423-429
[7]
Cicchetti D. V., 1971, American Journal of EEG Technology, V11, P101
[8]
HIGH AGREEMENT BUT LOW KAPPA .2. RESOLVING THE PARADOXES [J].
CICCHETTI, DV ;
FEINSTEIN, AR .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1990, 43 (06) :551-558
[9]
Eng TR., 1999, WIRED HLTH WELL BEIN
[10]
Patient reported outcomes as endpoints in medical research [J].
Fairclough, DL .
STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2004, 13 (02) :115-138