ICRAM-1: Model for international construction risk assessment

被引:186
作者
Hastak, M
Shaked, A
机构
[1] Univ Cincinnati, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Cincinnati, OH 45221 USA
[2] Moshkovitz Grp, IL-20302 Tel Hanan, Nesher, Israel
关键词
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2000)16:1(59)
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
This paper presents a risk assessment model for international construction projects. The International Construction Risk Assessment Model (ICRAM-1) assists the user in evaluating the potential risk involved in expanding operations in an international market by analyzing risk at the macro (or country environment), market, and project levels. The paper discusses some of the existing models for country risk assessment, presents potential risk indicators at the macro, market, and project levels, and explains the ICRAM-1 methodology through an applied example. The ICRAM-1 provides a structured approach for evaluating the risk indicators involved in an international construction operation and is designed to examine a specific project in a foreign country. It can be used as a tool to quantify the risk involved in an international construction investment as one of the preliminary steps in project evaluation. Four main results are obtained from the ICRAM-1 analysis: (1) High-risk indicators; (2) impact of country environment on a specific project; (3) impact of market environment on a specific project; and (4) overall project risk.
引用
收藏
页码:59 / 69
页数:11
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] DECISION-SUPPORT SYSTEM FOR MODELING BID NO-BID DECISION PROBLEM
    AHMAD, I
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT-ASCE, 1990, 116 (04): : 595 - 608
  • [2] Factors affecting contractors' risk of cost overburden
    Akinci, B
    Fischer, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT IN ENGINEERING, 1998, 14 (01) : 67 - 76
  • [3] AMMIANO M, 1988, CONTRACTOR, V35, P40
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1980, ANAL HIERARCHY PROCE
  • [5] POLITICAL RISKS IN INTERNATIONAL CONSTRUCTION
    ASHLEY, DB
    BONNER, JJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT-ASCE, 1987, 113 (03): : 447 - 467
  • [6] BULLOCK WM, 1989, P CONSTR C, V1
  • [7] CASCIO W, 1991, ORG DYNAMICS WIN, P63
  • [8] ENSOR R, 1981, ASSESSING COUNTRY RI
  • [9] Flanagan R., 1993, RISK MANAGEMENT CONS
  • [10] FRIDLIN I, 1996, THESIS POLYTECHNIC U