Biological hydrogen production using a membrane bioreactor

被引:150
作者
Oh, SE
Lyer, P
Bruns, MA
Logan, BE [1 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, COE Environm Inst, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[2] Penn State Univ, Dept Crop & Soil Sci, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
关键词
membrane bioreactor; hydrogen production; methanogen inhibition; cross-flow membrane; Clostridiaceae; Flexibacteraceae;
D O I
10.1002/bit.20127
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
A cross-flow membrane was coupled to a chemostat to create an anaerobic membrane bioreactor (MBR) for biological hydrogen production. The reactor was fed glucose (10,000 mg/L) and inoculated with a soil inoculum heat-treated to kill non-spore-forming methanogens. Hydrogen gas was consistently produced at a concentration of 57-60% in the headspace under all conditions. When operated in chemostat mode (no flow through the membrane) at a hydraulic retention time (HRT) of 3.3 h, 90% of the glucose was removed, producing 2200 mg/L of cells and 500 mL/h of biogas. When operated in MBR mode, the solids retention time (SRT) was increased to SRT = 12 h producing a solids concentration in the reactor of 5800 mg/L. This SRT increased the overall glucose utilization (98%), the biogas production rate (640 mL/h), and the conversion efficiency of glucose-to-hydrogen from 22% (no MBR) to 25% (based on a maximum of 4 mol-H-2/mol-glucose). When the SRT was increased from 5 h to 48 h, glucose utilization (99%) and biomass concentrations (8,800 +/- 600 mg/L) both increased. However, the biogas production decreased (310 +/- 40 mL/h) and the glucose-to-hydrogen conversion efficiency decreased from 37 +/- 4% to 18 +/- 3%. Sustained permeate flows through the membrane were in the. range of 57 to 60 L/m(2)h for three different membrane pore sizes (0.3, 0.5, and 0.8 mum). Most (93.7% to 99.3%) of the membrane resistance was due to internal fouling and the reversible cake resistance, and not the membrane itself. Regular backpulsing was essential for maintaining permeate flux through the membrane. Analysis of DNA sequences using ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis indicated bacteria were most closely related to members of Clostridiaceae and Flexibacteraceae, including Clostridium acidisoli CAC237756 (97%), Linmingia china AF481148 (97%), and Cytophaga sp. MDA2507 AF238333 (99%). No PCR amplification of 16S rRNA genes was obtained when archaea-specific primers were used. (C) 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:119 / 127
页数:9
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   Crossflow microfiltration with dynamic membranes [J].
AlMalack, MH ;
Anderson, GK .
WATER RESEARCH, 1997, 31 (08) :1969-1979
[2]   BASIC LOCAL ALIGNMENT SEARCH TOOL [J].
ALTSCHUL, SF ;
GISH, W ;
MILLER, W ;
MYERS, EW ;
LIPMAN, DJ .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1990, 215 (03) :403-410
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1995, Standard methods for examination of water and waste water, V19th
[4]   NUTRITIONAL FACTORS AFFECTING THE RATIO OF SOLVENTS PRODUCED BY CLOSTRIDIUM-ACETOBUTYLICUM [J].
BAHL, H ;
GOTTWALD, M ;
KUHN, A ;
RALE, V ;
ANDERSCH, W ;
GOTTSCHALK, G .
APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1986, 52 (01) :169-172
[5]   Design and operation of anaerobic membrane bioreactors: Development of a filtration testing strategy [J].
Beaubien, A ;
Baty, M ;
Jeannot, F ;
Francoeur, E ;
Manem, J .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 1996, 109 (02) :173-184
[6]  
Biebl H., 1999, Encyclopedia of Food Microbiology, P445
[7]  
BROSSEAU JD, 1982, J CHEM TECHNOL BIOT, V32, P496
[8]   Effectiveness of the membrane bioreactor in the biodegradation of high molecular weight compounds [J].
Cicek, N ;
Winnen, H ;
Suidan, MT ;
Wrenn, BE ;
Urbain, V ;
Manem, J .
WATER RESEARCH, 1998, 32 (05) :1553-1563
[9]   PARAMETERS AFFECTING SOLVENT PRODUCTION BY CLOSTRIDIUM-PASTEURIANUM [J].
DABROCK, B ;
BAHL, H ;
GOTTSCHALK, G .
APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1992, 58 (04) :1233-1239
[10]   Comparison between filtrations at fixed transmembrane pressure and fixed permeate flux: application to a membrane bioreactor used for wastewater treatment [J].
Defrance, L ;
Jaffrin, MY .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 1999, 152 (02) :203-210