Muscular efficiency during arm cranking and wheelchair exercise: A comparison

被引:30
作者
Hintzy, F
Tordi, N
Perrey, S
机构
[1] UFR CISM, Lab Modelisat Act Sport, Dept STAPS, F-73376 Le Bourget Du Lac, France
[2] Lab Sci Sport, Besancon, France
关键词
maximal exercise; submaximal exercise; gross efficiency; net efficiency; work efficiency; delta efficiency; relative intensity; healthy male subjects;
D O I
10.1055/s-2002-33734
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
The present study was performed to compare various individual muscular efficiency indices, i.e., gross (GE), net (NE), work (WE), and delta (DE), during arm cranking ergometer (ACE) and wheelchair ergometer (WERG) exercise at the same relative exercise intensities. Following a maximal test on both the ACE and WERG, 15 able-bodied subjects completed 4 submaximal bouts at 0, 40, 55 and 70% of the mode-specific V (over dot) O(2)peak. The peak power output and V (over dot) O-2 values were significantly higher with ACE than WERG maximal exercise. As a consequence, the power output imposed during WERG submaximal bouts was significantly lower compared to ACE submaximal bouts. ACE exercise was found to elicit a significantly higher (P < 0.001) V (over dot) O-2 (16 to 28 vs 14 to 23 ml x min(-1) x kg(-1)), GE (9 to 11 vs 6 to 9%) and NE (14 to 13 vs 10 to 11 %) compared to WERG exercise at power output from 40 to 70 % V (over dot) O(2)peak, respectively. However, WE (17 to 15 vs 17 to 14 % at 40 to 55 % V (over dot) O(2)peak) and DE (12 to 13 vs 12 to 12 % at Δ40 - 55 % to Δ55 - 70 % V (overdot) O(2)peak) values were similar between ACE and WERG exercise. The lower GE and NE observed during WERG compared to ACE exercise could be explained by the biomechanical disadvantages of the hand-rim WERG pattern movement. These findings also supported that the different indices of efficiency influenced the interpretation of the comparison between ACE and WERG propulsion.
引用
收藏
页码:408 / 414
页数:7
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   PHYSIOLOGICAL AND BIOMECHANICAL DIFFERENCES BETWEEN WHEELCHAIR-DEPENDENT AND ABLE-BODIED SUBJECTS DURING WHEELCHAIR ERGOMETRY [J].
BROWN, DD ;
KNOWLTON, RG ;
HAMILL, J ;
SCHNEIDER, TL ;
HETZLER, RK .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 1990, 60 (03) :179-182
[2]   Validation of a new ergometer adapted to all types of manual wheelchair [J].
Devillard, X ;
Calmels, P ;
Sauvignet, B ;
Belli, A ;
Denis, C ;
Simard, C ;
Gautheron, V .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 2001, 85 (05) :479-485
[3]   MUSCULAR EFFICIENCY DURING STEADY-RATE EXERCISE - EFFECTS OF SPEED AND WORK RATE [J].
GAESSER, GA ;
BROOKS, GA .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 1975, 38 (06) :1132-1139
[4]   METABOLIC AND CARDIOPULMONARY RESPONSES TO WHEELCHAIR AND BICYCLE ERGOMETRY [J].
GLASER, RM ;
SAWKA, MN ;
LAUBACH, LL ;
SURYAPRASAD, AG .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 1979, 46 (06) :1066-1070
[5]   PHYSIOLOGICAL-RESPONSES TO MAXIMAL EFFORT WHEELCHAIR AND ARM CRANK ERGOMETRY [J].
GLASER, RM ;
SAWKA, MN ;
BRUNE, MF ;
WILDE, SW .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 1980, 48 (06) :1060-1064
[6]  
Goosey VL, 2000, MED SCI SPORT EXER, V32, P174
[7]  
JONES D, 1992, Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, V24, pS32, DOI 10.1249/00005768-199205001-00192
[8]   Metabolic efficiency during arm and leg exercise at the same relative intensities [J].
Kang, J ;
Robertson, RJ ;
Goss, FL ;
Dasilva, SG ;
Suminski, RR ;
Utter, AC ;
Zoeller, RF ;
Metz, KF .
MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 1997, 29 (03) :377-382
[9]   PHYSIOLOGICAL-RESPONSES TO MAXIMAL EXERCISE ON ARM CRANKING AND WHEELCHAIR ERGOMETER WITH PARAPLEGICS [J].
MARTEL, G ;
NOREAU, L ;
JOBIN, J .
PARAPLEGIA, 1991, 29 (07) :447-456
[10]  
MCARDLE WD, 1981, EXERCISE PHYSL ENERG, P101