Validity of the incontinence severity index: comparison with pad-weighing tests

被引:154
作者
Sandvik, Hogne
Espuna, Montserrat
Hunskaar, Steinar
机构
[1] Univ Bergen, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Hlth Care, N-5015 Bergen, Norway
[2] Univ Barcelona, Hosp Clin, Inst Clin Ginecol Obstet Neonatol 1, Barcelona, Spain
关键词
urinary incontinence; severity of illness index; pad-weighing tests; comparative study;
D O I
10.1007/s00192-005-0060-z
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
The incontinence severity index (ISI) consists of two questions, regarding frequency and amount of leakage. It categorizes urinary incontinence (UI) into slight, moderate, severe, and very severe. The purpose of this study was to test its validity. The index was compared with the results of pad-weighing tests performed by 200 incontinent women referred to a hospital clinic and 103 at a primary care incontinence clinic. Inconvenience was scored by a six-level Likert scale. Mean pad-weighing results (grams per 24 hours, 95% confidence intervals) were 7 (4-10) for slight, 39 (26-51) for moderate, 102 (75-128) for severe, and 200 (131-268) for very severe UI. Spearman's correlation coefficient for pad-weighing results and severity index was 0.58 (p < 0.01), and inconvenience increased significantly with increasing severity. The ISI demonstrated good criterion validity against 24-h pad tests. Good construct validity was indicated by a clear link between ISI and inconvenience.
引用
收藏
页码:520 / 524
页数:5
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
Artibani W, 2002, INCONTINENCE, 2ND EDITION, P425
[2]   Risk of new-onset urinary incontinence after forceps and vacuum delivery in primiparous women [J].
Arya, LA ;
Jackson, ND ;
Myers, DL ;
Verma, A .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 185 (06) :1318-1323
[3]   Promoting urinary continence in women after delivery: randomised controlled trial [J].
Chiarelli, P ;
Cockburn, J .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2002, 324 (7348) :1241-+
[4]  
Donovan J, 2005, INCONTINENCE, VOLS 1 AND 2, P519
[5]  
Donovan JL, 2002, INCONTINENCE, 2ND EDITION, P267
[6]   Noninvasive outcome measures of urinary incontinence and lower urinary tract symptoms: A multicenter study of micturition diary and pad tests [J].
Groutz, A ;
Blaivas, JG ;
Chaikin, DC ;
Resnick, NM ;
Engleman, K ;
Anzalone, D ;
Bryzinski, B ;
Wein, AJ .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2000, 164 (03) :698-701
[7]   Reasons why women with long-term urinary incontinence do not seek professional help:: a cross-sectional population-based cohort study [J].
Hägglund, D ;
Walker-Engström, ML ;
Larsson, G ;
Leppert, J .
INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2003, 14 (05) :296-304
[8]   Familial risk of urinary incontinence in women: population based cross sectional study [J].
Hahnestad, YS ;
Lie, RT ;
Rortveit, G ;
Hunskaar, S .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 329 (7471) :889-891
[9]   Validity study of the severity index, a simple measure of urinary incontinence in women [J].
Hanley, J ;
Capewell, A ;
Hagen, S .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 322 (7294) :1096-1097
[10]   A community-based epidemiological survey of female urinary incontinence: The Norwegian EPINCONT Study [J].
Hannestad, YS ;
Rortveit, G ;
Sandvik, H ;
Hunskaar, S .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2000, 53 (11) :1150-1157