Economic analysis of a community-based falls prevention program

被引:30
作者
Beard, J.
Rowell, D.
Scott, D.
van Beurden, E.
Barnett, L.
Hughes, K.
Newman, B.
机构
[1] So Cross Univ, No Rivers Univ Dept Rural Hlth, Univ Sydney, Lismore, NSW 2480, Australia
[2] New York Acad Med, New York, NY USA
[3] N Coast Area Hlth Serv, Limsore, Australia
[4] Queensland Univ Technol, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
falls prevention; cost-benefit analysis; diagnosis-related groups; net present value; health promotion;
D O I
10.1016/j.puhe.2006.04.011
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 [公共卫生与预防医学]; 120402 [社会医学与卫生事业管理];
摘要
Objectives: To undertake a cost-benefit analysis of 'Stay on Your Feet', a community-based falls prevention program targeting older people at all levels of risk in New South Wales, Australia. Hospital separations were monitored in the intervention region, a control region and for the state of New South Wales as a whole. Changing admission patterns over the intervention period were used to assess the impact of the program. Methods: Cost-benefit analysis compared the costs of the program with two estimates of savings from avoided hospital admissions. The first compared the cost of hospital admissions in the intervention region to a control region of similar demographics, while the second compared hospital utilization in the intervention region with the state of New South Wales as a whole using falls-related hospital diagnosis related group (DRG) codes. Results: The total direct costs of the program were estimated at A$781 829. Both methods identified clear overall net benefits ranging from A$5.4 million for avoided hospitalizations alone to A$16.9 million for all avoided direct and indirect costs. The confidence intervals around these estimates were small. The average overall benefit to cost ratio for the intervention as a whole was 20.6:1. Conclusions: These findings suggest that well-designed community-based interventions targeting falls prevention among older people are highly cost effective and a wise investment for all levels of government. The models used are conservative and are likely to underestimate the real benefit of the intervention, which may have tasted for some time beyond the life of the program. (c) 2006 The Royal Institute of Public Health. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:742 / 751
页数:10
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]
ABELE P, 2000, P 30 EUR MICR C PAR, P1
[2]
Armitage P., 2001, STAT METHODS MED RES, V4th
[3]
Intervention strategies and risk-factor modification for falls prevention - A review of recent intervention studies [J].
Cumming, RG .
CLINICS IN GERIATRIC MEDICINE, 2002, 18 (02) :175-+
[4]
*DEP FIN, 1994, HDB COST BEN AN
[5]
DRUMMOND M, 1998, METHODS EC EVALUATIO
[6]
MORTALITY, DISABILITY, AND FALLS IN OLDER PERSONS - THE ROLE OF UNDERLYING DISEASE AND DISABILITY [J].
DUNN, JE ;
RUDBERG, MA ;
FURNER, SE ;
CASSEL, CK .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1992, 82 (03) :395-400
[7]
CONFIDENCE LIMITS ON RATIO OF 2 POISSON VARIABLES [J].
EDERER, F ;
MANTEL, N .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1974, 100 (03) :165-167
[8]
Englander F, 1996, J FORENSIC SCI, V41, P733
[9]
FORBESPOTTER M, 2003, INJURY COSTS VALUATI, P88
[10]
Exercise in preventing falls and fall related injuries in older people: a review of randomised controlled trials [J].
Gardner, MM ;
Robertson, MG ;
Campbell, AJ .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2000, 34 (01) :7-17