Importance of pressure recovery for the assessment of aortic stenosis by Doppler ultrasound - Role of aortic size, aortic valve area, and direction of the stenotic jet in vitro

被引:136
作者
Niederberger, J
Schima, H
Maurer, G
Baumgartner, H
机构
[1] UNIV VIENNA,DEPT CARDIOL,VIENNA GEN HOSP,A-1090 VIENNA,AUSTRIA
[2] UNIV VIENNA,BIOMED RES CTR,VIENNA GEN HOSP,LUDWIG BOLTZMANN RES INST,A-1090 VIENNA,AUSTRIA
关键词
echocardiography; hemodynamics; valves;
D O I
10.1161/01.CIR.94.8.1934
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Pressure recovery has been shown to occur distal to aortic stenoses in experimental and clinical studies. However, its clinical relevance in this setting has not yet been evaluated. Methods and Results To address the hypothesis that pressure recovery can cause significant differences between Doppler and catheter gradients in aortic stenosis and to examine the effects of aortic size, aortic valve area, and direction of the stenotic jet on these differences, stenoses with valve areas from 0.5 to 1.25 cm(2) and aortic diameters from 1.8 to 5.0 cm were studied in a pulsatile flow model. Jets entered the aorta centrally or eccentrically with angles of 15 degrees, 30 degrees, or 45 degrees. Overall, good correlation was found between Doppler and catheter gradients. However, when the various combinations of orifices and aortas were analyzed separately, slopes varied from 1.0 to 1.86, and the Doppler-catheter gradient differences ranged from -2 (small valve area with a large aorta) to 66 mm Hg (80% overestimation by Doppler echocardiography) when the stenosis was moderate and the aorta was small. Mild eccentricity of the jet did not significantly alter the results. However, overestimation by Doppler decreased with increasing jet eccentricity. Finally, differences between Doppler and catheter gradients could be predicted by estimating pressure recovery from Doppler measurements. Conclusions Significant pressure recovery can occur in aortic stenosis and can cause differences between Doppler and catheter gradients. These differences may reach clinical relevance, particularly when the stenosis is moderate and the aorta is small and can be predicted from Doppler measurements.
引用
收藏
页码:1934 / 1940
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
BAUMGARTNER H, 1987, Z KARDIOL, V76, P351
[2]   EFFECT OF PROSTHETIC AORTIC-VALVE DESIGN ON THE DOPPLER-CATHETER GRADIENT CORRELATION - AN INVITRO STUDY OF NORMAL ST-JUDE, MEDTRONIC-HALL, STARR-EDWARDS AND HANCOCK VALVES [J].
BAUMGARTNER, H ;
KHAN, S ;
DEROBERTIS, M ;
CZER, L ;
MAURER, G .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1992, 19 (02) :324-332
[3]   EFFECT OF PROSTHETIC VALVE MALFUNCTION ON THE DOPPLER-CATHETER GRADIENT RELATION FOR BILEAFLET AORTIC-VALVE PROSTHESES [J].
BAUMGARTNER, H ;
SCHIMA, H ;
KUHN, P .
CIRCULATION, 1993, 87 (04) :1320-1327
[4]   DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN DOPPLER AND CATHETER GRADIENTS IN AORTIC PROSTHETIC VALVES INVITRO - A MANIFESTATION OF LOCALIZED GRADIENTS AND PRESSURE RECOVERY [J].
BAUMGARTNER, H ;
KHAN, S ;
DEROBERTIS, M ;
CZER, L ;
MAURER, G .
CIRCULATION, 1990, 82 (04) :1467-1475
[5]   EFFECT OF STENOSIS GEOMETRY ON THE DOPPLER-CATHETER GRADIENT RELATION INVITRO - A MANIFESTATION OF PRESSURE RECOVERY [J].
BAUMGARTNER, H ;
SCHIMA, H ;
TULZER, G ;
KUHN, P .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1993, 21 (04) :1018-1025
[6]  
BAUMGARTNER H, 1994, CIRCULATION, V90, P594
[7]  
BAUMGARTNER H, 1991, CIRCULATION S2, V84, P164
[8]   FLUID-MECHANICS OF AORTIC-STENOSIS .1. THEORY AND STEADY FLOW EXPERIMENTS [J].
CLARK, C .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1976, 9 (08) :521-528
[9]   FLUID-MECHANICS OF AORTIC-STENOSIS .2. UNSTEADY-FLOW EXPERIMENTS [J].
CLARK, C .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1976, 9 (09) :567-&
[10]   CONTINUOUS-WAVE DOPPLER ECHOCARDIOGRAPHIC ASSESSMENT OF SEVERITY OF CALCIFIC AORTIC-STENOSIS - A SIMULTANEOUS DOPPLER-CATHETER CORRELATIVE STUDY IN 100 ADULT PATIENTS [J].
CURRIE, PJ ;
SEWARD, JB ;
REEDER, GS ;
VLIETSTRA, RE ;
BRESNAHAN, DR ;
BRESNAHAN, JF ;
SMITH, HC ;
HAGLER, DJ ;
TAJIK, AJ .
CIRCULATION, 1985, 71 (06) :1162-1169