Compliance with restrictions on sale of indoor tanning sessions to youth in Minnesota and Massachusetts

被引:38
作者
Forster, Jean L.
Lazovich, DeAnn
Hickle, Andrea
Sorensen, Glorian
Demierre, Marie-France
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Div Epidemiol & Community Hlth, Minneapolis, MN 55454 USA
[2] Univ Minnesota, Ctr Publ Hlth Educ & Outreach, Minneapolis, MN 55454 USA
[3] Harvard Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Soc Human Dev & Hlth, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Boston Univ, Sch Med, Dept Dermatol, Boston, MA 02118 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.jaad.2006.06.036
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
Background: Minnesota and Massachusetts require parental permission, for persons younger than 16 or 18 years of age, respectively, for indoor tanning. Objectives: This report examines business practices and characteristics associated with sales of indoor tanning to underage girls. Methods: Fifteen-year-old girls tried to purchase an ultraviolet tanning session in 200 indoor tanning businesses in the Minneapolis-St Paul and Boston areas without parental consent. Business characteristics were recorded. Later, businesses were interviewed by telephone about their facilities and practices. Results: Eighty-one percent of businesses sold a session to an underaged buyer on at least one of two tries. illegal purchases did not differ by state. Businesses least likely to sell were larger, dedicated to indoor tanning, required employee certification, and had a minimum age of sale for their business. However, businesses in each of these categories still sold tanning sessions to underaged adolescents at 44% to 62% of the visits. Employees who requested parental consent or age identification almost never sold a session. Limitations: Businesses in Minnesota and Massachusetts only were included. Conclusion: Minnesota and Massachusetts laws specifying a minimum age of sale for indoor tanning are ineffective.
引用
收藏
页码:962 / 967
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
*AM CANC SOC, 2004, CANC PREV EARL DET F
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2003, ART TANN SUNB RISKS
[3]  
BARRETT SA, 2003, LOOKING FIT, V18, P64
[4]  
BARRETT SA, 2002, LOOKING FIT, V17, P86
[5]   Compliance with federal and state legislation by indoor tanning facilities in San Diego [J].
Culley, CA ;
Mayer, JA ;
Eckhardt, L ;
Busic, AJ ;
Eichenfield, LF ;
Sallis, JF ;
Quintana, PJE ;
Woodruff, SI .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 2001, 44 (01) :53-60
[6]   Youth access laws - In the dark at the tanning parlor? [J].
Dellavalle, RP ;
Parker, ER ;
Cersonsky, N ;
Hester, EJ ;
Hemme, B ;
Burkhardt, DL ;
Chen, AK ;
Schilling, LM .
ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGY, 2003, 139 (04) :443-448
[7]   The federal initiative to halt the sale of tobacco to children - the Synar Amendment, 1992-2000: lessons learned [J].
DiFranza, JR ;
Dussault, GF .
TOBACCO CONTROL, 2005, 14 (02) :93-98
[8]  
EDVARDSEN L, 2003, TANNING TRENDS, V18, P91
[9]  
*FED TRAD COMM, POL STAT DEC
[10]   Youth access to tobacco: Policies and politics [J].
Forster, JL ;
Wolfson, M .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1998, 19 :203-235