Host-parasite coevolution and selection on sex through the effects of segregation

被引:29
作者
Agrawal, Aneil F.
Otto, Sarah P.
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Dept Ecol & Evolutionary Biol, Toronto, ON M5S 3G5, Canada
[2] Univ British Columbia, Dept Zool, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
关键词
Red Queen hypothesis; host-parasite coevolution; evolution of sex; segregation; modifier model;
D O I
10.1086/508029
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 [生物信息与计算生物学]; 0713 [生态学];
摘要
The advantage of producing novel variation to keep apace of coevolving species has been invoked as a major explanation for the evolution and maintenance of sex ( the Red Queen hypothesis). Recent theoretical investigations of the Red Queen hypothesis have focused on the effects of recombination in haploid species, finding that species interactions rarely favor the evolution of sex unless selection is strong. Yet by focusing on haploids, these studies have ignored a potential advantage of sex in diploids: generating novel combinations of alleles at a particular locus through segregation. Here we investigate models of host-parasite coevolution in diploid species to determine whether the advantages of segregation might rescue the Red Queen hypothesis as a more general explanation for the evolution of sex. We find that the effects of segregation can favor the evolution of sex but only under some models of infection and some parameter combinations, almost always requiring inbreeding. In all other cases, the effects of segregation on selected loci favor reductions in the frequency of sex. In cases where segregation and recombination act in opposite directions, we found that the effects of segregation dominate as an evolutionary force acting on sex in diploids.
引用
收藏
页码:617 / 629
页数:13
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]
Similarity selection and the evolution of sex: Revisiting the red queen [J].
Agrawal, Aneil F. .
PLOS BIOLOGY, 2006, 4 (08) :1364-1371
[2]
Before crossing over: the advantages of eukaryotic sex in genomes lacking chiasmatic recombination [J].
Antezana, MA ;
Hudson, RR .
GENETICS RESEARCH, 1997, 70 (01) :7-25
[3]
BARTON NH, 1991, GENETICS, V127, P229
[4]
Bell G., 1982, MASTERPIECE NATURE E
[5]
BENNETT J. H., 1956, HEREDITY, V10, P51, DOI 10.1038/hdy.1956.3
[6]
SEX AND POLYMORPHISM AS STRATEGIES IN HOST-PATHOGEN INTERACTIONS [J].
BREMERMANN, HJ .
JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, 1980, 87 (04) :671-702
[7]
THE COST OF SEX IN RELATION TO MATING SYSTEM [J].
CHARLESWORTH, B .
JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, 1980, 84 (04) :655-671
[8]
Crute I. R., 1997, GENE FOR GENE RELATI
[9]
Dolgin ES, 2003, GENETICS, V164, P1119
[10]
Population genetic perspectives on the evolution of recombination [J].
Feldman, MW ;
Otto, SP ;
Christiansen, FB .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF GENETICS, 1996, 30 :261-295