Using conservation systems to alleviate soil compaction in a Southeastern United States ultisol

被引:26
作者
Simoes, R. P. [1 ]
Raper, R. L. [2 ]
Arriaga, F. J. [2 ]
Balkcom, K. S. [2 ]
Shaw, J. N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Auburn Univ, Dept Agron & Soils, Auburn, AL 36849 USA
[2] ARS, USDA, Natl Soil Dynam Lab, Auburn, AL 36832 USA
关键词
Compaction; Conservation tillage; Cover crop; Subsoiling; Cotton drought resistance; COASTAL-PLAIN SOILS; TILLAGE SYSTEMS; PEANUT RESIDUE; COTTON YIELD; DEEP TILLAGE; COVER CROP; REQUIREMENTS; MANAGEMENT; STRENGTH; ENERGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.still.2009.01.004
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
090301 [土壤学];
摘要
Coastal Plain soils are prone to compaction layers which restrict root growth and reduce yields. The adoption of non-inversion deep tillage has been recommended to disrupt compacted soil layers and create an adequate medium for crop development. In spite of its efficacy, increased fuel prices could reduce in-row subsoiling adoption due to the cost of the operation. We evaluated three subsoiling implements against a non-subsoiled treatment with and without a rye (Secale cereale L) cover crop on a 4-year cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L)-peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) rotation experiment in Headland, AL on a Dothan loamy sand (Plinthic Kandiudult). Results showed consistently lower yields for non-subsoiled treatments (11 and 51% lower yields for peanuts and cotton, respectively). Soil strength values had a 2 fold increase or greater (1.5-4.0 MPa) in less than a year due to natural reconsolidation and normal vehicle traffic. On average, in-row subsoiling returned $698/ha/year for cotton and $612/ha/year more for all in-row subsoiling than non-subsoiled treatments. No differences between implements were found. A conservation system consisting of annual paratilling combined with a winter cover crop proved to be the most productive and profitable system. Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:106 / 114
页数:9
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]
The soil water balance of rainfed and irrigated oats, Italian rye grass and rye using the CropSyst model [J].
Abraha, Michael G. ;
Savage, Michael J. .
IRRIGATION SCIENCE, 2008, 26 (03) :203-212
[2]
*AL COOP EXT SYST, 2008, 2008 ENT PLANN BUDG
[3]
ALIHAMSYAH T, 1991, P 1991 S AUT AGR 21
[4]
ASABE, 2005, EP2913FEB2005 ASABE EP2913FEB2005 ASABE
[5]
*ASABE, 2004, EP542 ASABE
[6]
ASABE Standard, 2004, S3133 ASABE
[7]
Modeling the relationship between soil bulk density and the water retention curve [J].
Assouline, S. .
VADOSE ZONE JOURNAL, 2006, 5 (02) :554-563
[8]
BAKER RD, 2000, PEANUT PRODUCTION GU
[9]
Balkcom K. S., 2004, Peanut Science, V31, P6, DOI 10.3146/pnut.31.1.0002
[10]
Suitability of peanut residue as a nitrogen source for a rye cover crop [J].
Balkcom, Kipling Shane ;
Wood, Charles Wesley ;
Adams', James Fredrick ;
Mesol, Bernard .
SCIENTIA AGRICOLA, 2007, 64 (02) :181-186