Flavor quality and ethanol concentration affect ethanol-conditioned flavor preferences

被引:9
作者
Ackroff, K
Sclafani, A
机构
[1] CUNY Brooklyn Coll, Dept Psychol, Brooklyn, NY 11210 USA
[2] CUNY, Grad Sch, Brooklyn, NY 11210 USA
关键词
flavor conditioning; ethanol; gastric infusions; saccharin;
D O I
10.1016/S0091-3057(02)00987-5
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
A previous report showed that outbred rats acquired preferences for a sweetened conditioned stimulus (CS) flavor paired with intragastric ethanol. To evaluate the role of sweet taste in ethanol conditioning, this study compared training with sweetened and unsweetened flavors. In Experiment 1, nondeprived rats were trained to drink one flavored solution (CS+, e.g., grape) paired with intragastric infusion of 5% ethanol and another (CS-, e.g., cherry) paired with intragastric water on alternate days. The volume of ethanol solution infused was matched to the volume of flavored solution the rats consumed. The sweet group's flavors initially contained 0.2% saccharin, reduced to 0.1%, 0.05%, and 0% over days; the plain group's flavors were unsweetened. The sweet group drank more and self-infused more ethanol during training and its preference for the CS+ over the CS- (without saccharin) exceeded that of the plain group (75% versus 62%). Experiment 2 equated total ethanol intake in rats trained with two combinations of flavor quality and ethanol concentration. The Sweet5 group drank flavors with 0.2% saccharin throughout training and tests and received 5% ethanol when they drank CS+, while the Plain10 group drank unsweetened flavors and the CS+ was paired with 10% ethanol. Despite equal daily ethanol doses, the Sweet5 group strongly preferred the CS+ (89%) while the Plain10 group avoided it (31%). The two groups continued to show opposite CS+ preference profiles even when both were tested with sweet CS flavors and 10% ethanol infusions. Thus, sweet taste contributes to the development of ethanol-conditioned flavor preferences, and this effect is not explained by a simple enhancement of ethanol intake. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:229 / 240
页数:12
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]   Flavor preferences conditioned by intragastric infusion of ethanol in rats [J].
Ackroff, K ;
Sclafani, A .
PHARMACOLOGY BIOCHEMISTRY AND BEHAVIOR, 2001, 68 (02) :327-338
[2]   FLAVOR PREFERENCES CONDITIONED BY INTRAGASTRIC INFUSIONS OF DILUTE POLYCOSE SOLUTIONS [J].
ACKROFF, K ;
SCLAFANI, A .
PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR, 1994, 55 (05) :957-962
[3]  
ACKROFF K, 1998, APPETITE, V31, P290
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1999, NEURAL METABOLIC CON
[5]   Flavor preferences conditioned by intragastric sugar infusions in rats: Maltose is more reinforcing than sucrose [J].
Azzara, AV ;
Sclafani, A .
PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR, 1998, 64 (04) :535-541
[6]   EFFECT OF PRIOR ETHANOL EXPERIENCE ON ETHANOL-INDUCED SACCHARIN AVERSIONS [J].
BERMAN, RF ;
CANNON, DS .
PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR, 1974, 12 (06) :1041-1044
[7]   POSTINGESTIVE MODULATION OF SWEETNESS PREFERENCE GRADIENT IN RAT [J].
BOOTH, DA ;
LOVETT, D ;
MCSHERRY, GM .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1972, 78 (03) :485-&
[8]   EFFECT OF TASTE-AVERSION LEARNING ON ETHANOL SELF-ADMINISTRATION [J].
CANNON, DS ;
CARRELL, LE .
PHARMACOLOGY BIOCHEMISTRY AND BEHAVIOR, 1987, 28 (01) :53-56
[9]   ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE AND TASTE-MEDIATED LEARNING IN THE RAT [J].
CRAWFORD, D ;
BAKER, TB .
PHARMACOLOGY BIOCHEMISTRY AND BEHAVIOR, 1982, 16 (02) :253-261
[10]   Flavor preference conditioning by oral self-administration of ethanol [J].
Cunningham, CL ;
Niehus, JS .
PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1997, 134 (03) :293-302