An analysis of the use of life cycle assessment for waste co-incineration in cement kilns

被引:66
作者
Galvez-Martos, Jose-Luis [1 ]
Schoenberger, Harald [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Aberdeen, Kings Coll, Sch Engn, Aberdeen AB24 3UE, Scotland
[2] Inst Prospect Technol Studies, E-41092 Seville, Spain
关键词
Life cycle assessment; Waste co-incineration; Cement kilns; Greenhouse gases emissions; Uncertainty analysis; Mercury; ENVIRONMENTAL-IMPACT; LCA; INVENTORIES; EMISSIONS; ENERGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.02.009
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Life cycle assessment, LCA, has become a key methodology to evaluate the environmental performance of products, services and processes and it is considered a powerful tool for decision makers. Waste treatment options are frequently evaluated using LCA methodologies in order to determine the option with the lowest environmental impact. Due to the approximate nature of LCA, where results are highly influenced by the assumptions made in the definition of the system, this methodology has certain non-negligible limitations. Because of that, the use of LCA to assess waste co-incineration in cement kilns is reviewed in this paper, with a special attention to those key inventory results highly dependent on the initial assumptions made. Therefore, the main focus of this paper is the life cycle inventory, LCI, of carbon emissions, primary energy and air emissions. When the focus is made on cement production, a tonne of cement is usually the functional unit. In this case, waste co-incineration has a non-significant role on CO2 emissions from the cement kiln and an important energy efficiency loss can be deduced from the industry performance data, which is rarely taken into account by LCA practitioners. If cement kilns are considered as another waste treatment option, the functional unit is usually 1 t of waste to be treated. In this case, it has been observed that contradictory results may arise depending on the initial assumptions, generating high uncertainty in the results. Air emissions, as heavy metals, are quite relevant when assessing waste co-incineration, as the amount of pollutants in the input are increased. Constant transfer factors are mainly used for heavy metals, but it may not be the correct approach for mercury emissions. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:118 / 131
页数:14
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]  
Ammenberg J, 2011, BAAS L IND S IMPR CO
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2012, ALTERNATIVE FUELS RA, DOI DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2008.07.017
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1995, RES DEV B
[4]  
[Anonymous], ENV BEN US ALT FUELS
[5]  
BEEF CLM, 2010, LIM MAGN OX MAN IND
[6]  
Binninger T, 2009, INT CEM REV, V5, P67
[7]   Identifying Improvement Potentials in Cement Production with Life Cycle Assessment [J].
Boesch, Michael Elias ;
Hellweg, Stefanie .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 44 (23) :9143-9149
[8]   Model for Cradle-to-Gate Life Cycle Assessment of Clinker Production [J].
Boesch, Michael Elias ;
Koehler, Annette ;
Hellweg, Stefanie .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 43 (19) :7578-7583
[9]   Chemistry and engineering of the clinkerization process - Incremental advances and lack of breakthroughs [J].
Chatterjee, Anjan K. .
CEMENT AND CONCRETE RESEARCH, 2011, 41 (07) :624-641
[10]   LCA allocation procedure used as an incitative method for waste recycling: An application to mineral additions in concrete [J].
Chen, C. ;
Habert, G. ;
Bouzidi, Y. ;
Jullien, A. ;
Ventura, A. .
RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2010, 54 (12) :1231-1240